LeoSalinas22
merely a shadow...
- Messages
- 719
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Leo,
Actually, that was not a very accurate depiction of scientology. I would suggest you read the book Dianetics to get a clearer understanding of the basics. What the referenced writer has done can be done to Christianity to also make it appear as utter nonsense by focusing on such things as a whale swallowing Noah and spitting him up alive three days later. A jackass speaking, the sun moving back-wards or standing still for about a day, and in the NT graves opening up and people coming out of them and showing themselves to many others in Jerusalem as alive, just to name a few. A lot of religions have beliefs that can appear as irrational as the one focused on in your reference. Just a view to consider.
Love and Peace,
JM
JM,
Which 1?, I have read 3. And I tell you exactly why Lafayette so rigorously dissses psychiatry/psychology. It is because a study of this Cult or its members would reveal it to be a deliberate scam devised by a confirmed scamster. The 3 books are riddled with the weaknesses of Hubbards ego and his paranoia of exposure. Truly, reading his books is laughable, a sick comedy when you know his intent. Scientology is not a religion, its a deliberate pseudo-religion that has dangerous policies and nothing but nothing to hail it as a force for good. It should be outlawed as a scam cult.
Tao
Leo,
Actually, that was not a very accurate depiction of scientology. I would suggest you read the book Dianetics to get a clearer understanding of the basics. What the referenced writer has done can be done to Christianity to also make it appear as utter nonsense by focusing on such things as a whale swallowing Noah and spitting him up alive three days later. A jackass speaking, the sun moving back-wards or standing still for about a day, and in the NT graves opening up and people coming out of them and showing themselves to many others in Jerusalem as alive, just to name a few. A lot of religions have beliefs that can appear as irrational as the one focused on in your reference. Just a view to consider.
Love and Peace,
JM
JosephM said:What the referenced writer has done can be done to Christianity to also make it appear as utter nonsense by focusing on such things as a whale swallowing Noah and spitting him up alive three days later.
I'd be concerned too, if it focused on Noah getting swallowed by a whale, especially since it was Jonah who was the cetacean's lunch that day.
hi joseph,
i know it wasn't an accurate depiction because of the "cartoony loony" that scientology was presented. but, i really wanted to know how much of the information on the link was actually true? like about the alien xanu and hubbard's claim to go to space? thanks.
Thanks Dondi for the correction but you get the point and as a bonus see the fallability of human communications in my writing and possibly others.
Love and Peace,
JM
Leo,
If you are seroius about understanding scientology this question is irrelevant as most scientologists aren't even exposed to that information. It was leaked and has little to do with the fundamental principles of scientology as a religion as can stories or portions of any religion. Just my personal view but I would recommend examining the basic published teachings and making your own informed opinion.
Love and Peace,
JM