Recent content by gluadys

  1. G

    The Evolution Conflict

    Mohsin, there are so many factual errors in this paragraph alone it would take several posts to correct them. Basically, you have a flawed understanding of what the theory of evolution actually proposes. For example: 1. The theory of evolution does NOT propose that there is no God or that...
  2. G

    The Evolution Conflict

    So far, so good, by both samabudhi and juantoo3. Carbon dating cannot be used on fossils for two reasons: 1. The half-life of carbon 14 is very short. We probably would not have any carbon 14 in nature at all if it was not being continuously made in the atmosphere through a chemical reaction...
  3. G

    The Evolution Conflict

    Probably the best way to understand these creatures is as modern descendants of species which were cousins to ancient transitional species. Lungfish especially. Did you know that lungfish appear in the fossil record before fish with swim bladders? And the early land-vertebrates appear to be...
  4. G

    The Evolution Conflict

    Thanks for the corrected link, samabudhi. I have appreciated your posts as well. But I must take issue with you here. It is untrue to say science is "not on God's side." Science is entirely neutral on the question of God, since God is not of a nature to be apprehended by scientific inquiry...
  5. G

    The Evolution Conflict

    Actually, Brian, you are referring again to the study of abiogenesis, not the study of evolution. Evolution assumes that life already exists. Abiogenesis is quite a new field of biological study aimed at determining whether and how non-living matter could develop replicative powers and...
  6. G

    Prove that the Bible is full of contradictions-- I double dare you!

    No, quite the opposite in fact. There is nothing wrong with trying to live the right way or doing good works. In fact, if one is not doing such works it is a clear sign one is not on the right way. But the motive is important. The atheist who lives the right way can often be closer to...
  7. G

    Prove that the Bible is full of contradictions-- I double dare you!

    Indeed, BINGO! and Amen! Also love your interpretation of the Flood.
  8. G

    Prove that the Bible is full of contradictions-- I double dare you!

    Oh, I agree with barefoot girl or rather her boss. The right way IS the easy way when all is said and done. Though often it doesn't look easy at first. That is also the philosophy of Tao. When you truly follow the right way it turns out to be the easy way, because it is in accord with the...
  9. G

    Prove that the Bible is full of contradictions-- I double dare you!

    Oh, I am glad somebody said it. We fall too quickly and too easily into dualistic oppositions like harsh OT God vs. loving NT God. In fact, all that the NT says about God's love is said in the OT too, and some of what the OT says about God's wrath and judgment is in the NT...
  10. G

    Prove that the Bible is full of contradictions-- I double dare you!

    According to Richard Friedman (Who Wrote the Bible?) you are both right. The split between the two accounts is in the middle of verse four, like this: 2:4a "These are the genertions of the heavens and the earth when they were created." (end of first account) 2:4b "In the day that the...
  11. G

    Prove that the Bible is full of contradictions-- I double dare you!

    Since I am not committed to a doctrine of inerrancy, it doesn't matter much to me that there are a number of contradictions in the bible when various writers mention the same event. Most of them are quite minor, the sort of thing one expects when oral tradition is passed along different tribal...
  12. G

    matter and energy

    That was Einstein's position. He was a religious person but did not believe in a personal God. More of a pantheist. Sounds to me like you are disagreeing with Einstein on this point. Other scientists with spiritual leanings as well. Those I have read (e.g. Chardin, Capra, Polkinghorne)...
  13. G

    The Evolution Conflict

    Well sama and luna, You are both quicker than me. But I think we have all come at the defects of the article in different ways and made different points. Sama, I tried the link in your post and got a dead end. Would you check it out and see if a good one can be made? It sounded very...
  14. G

    The Evolution Conflict

    With all due respect Mohsin, you have derived your information from sources which appear to have mis-understood the theory of evolution. I have studied the theory of evolution (as an interested lay person, not a professional) for 40 years and I have found many errors in the articles you have...
  15. G

    The Evolution Conflict

    Three cheers for Gellman and Hartman. A really great response. We need more people like them. I saw only a small factual error, here: "Darwin thought genetic mutations made people, animals and plants different," Darwin didn't think that, because he didn't know about genetic mutations...
Back
Top