Search results

can be anything, perception if you like, i just thought i would diverge. the main thrust is towards those glypses we get where something seams to be there but is not, then we find that it was there at some point in time [like jung had]. or deja-vu y’know anything to do with the idea of a...

indeed, i am not a christian i am a universalist/anarchist/paganish so that is exactly what i think. :) ...no offence meant. i only mean that in the literal context of such stories.

as in last post. if he creates the world in one way then the world is what it is, he cannot then create it in another way without first destroying what he has already made [in his all-perfection!]. infinity is no magician and even if it were in some way, there are logical restrictions. yes...

how would he use methods of the material world? [remembering that god is not physical] in a sense we are all born of immaculate conception, if not then none can be... here is my answer from my last post ~ even if not interested lols. i think it will help answer that too. add the points...

no, in that language yes, however if we consider it in terms of everything being expressions of infinity from the quantum level up + infinite intellect [whatever that may be], then it is not so far fetched. simply put reality is like an ocean from which all things arise. i do see the...

enlightenment hi yeah that always got me too, jesus made his own mother pregnant with himself! *gasps* as for the pregnancy, presumably there is a spiritual connection at conception right, so given that science can make an egg think it has been impregnated - so to say, it is quite possible...

bananabrain hi whilst i agree with the subjectivism you spoke of [thanks], personally i don’t think god would speak to anyone. to do so simply set that person aside from all others ~ as a father i wouldn’t treat my children so. on this then i can only agree to disagree with religions, neither...

oops i never notice whats going on do i lols. here's a rather late thank you then!

when you arrived at the cafe sure you were already there, your incarnations like tv shows. eventually you realise you are the godhead and all are incarnations of you, yet they are also incarnations of me and everyone else. ...who are you! :eek: :D

hi alex :) haha yes. perhaps all tables are reserved. ...maybe all chocolate boxes too [incarnation sets].

bananabrain, hi sure, god used the phone ~ so to say, i.e. you can talk straight to someone without seeing them. i would ask if god would do this, my reasoning is that; god speaking to one man is like god speaking to all men. yet god may speak to all men if he can talk to one yes? so why...

hi pandamentionalbeing ~ whats a pandamentional being? a play on pandimensional and panda i presume. :D no-one has answered this one before and you have actually joined in! :) an interesting direction and take on it you put there, a hi kaballah eh. so are you adding time travel via visions...

hi enlightenment if it is not linguistic it cannot be literal. if ‘truth’ be told by another means it will always be from the infinite to the finite. this is of course an impossible feat which will always invoke paradoxes ~ perhaps g?d is a poet! even if this were not true, i would still...

mind if i jump in on this one :) how do we know he is a ‘creator’, there is no evidence that anything in existence is created. secondly, we are eternal souls yes, so we also [ergo the spiritual kingdoms] are not created. how can an infinite being visit us? ‘he’ could be with us perpetually...

below is a sample of my utter madness, lols it is designed to build ideas from, so we can chat about anything related to time and rebirth etc. it is mainly metaphoric of course, the ‘dark’ time traveller simply infers that there are no rules, it is what it is, just as any reality would be...

hi, resigned i don’t belong to any religion or cult and was brought up as an athiest. i am aware of that, ‘ape’ was simply referring to the group where used as a common euphemism for that common ancestor, it was just for the title for the op really. the point was that we are more than...

i see your point, though a child is a burden we want and enjoy, it is also a burden we have put on others to get to adulthood. this is burden within the family unit, what i am talking about is burden put upon society i.e. other families. too many people on earth would simply mean taking bread...

an expression comes to mind... ‘not what they want, what is good for them’! oliver cromwell well burning people is not good for them oliver, but if we could have a highly educated leader who ignored the people, it could be very good for humanity. i would rather not exist than be a burden.

yes, to reality if you will, there is either no significance or everything is very significant. then to the particular there is both relatively, so i would go with both of our answers.

indeed, perhaps there is an equilibrious medium at which all things are equally important, hence over time the significant becomes insignificant and vice versa.