Search results

Did you know that chatbots are legally obligated to respond to subpoenas for whatever information you share with them? So be careful what you ask them or what you use them for. So if you ask ChatGPT the best way to rob a bank, and you are now a suspect in a bank robbery, ChatGPT has to hand...

I meant to add something to what I said later. As I stated earlier, I have been looking at older posts. So if you are a veteran member here, and you notice that I have been liking old posts of yours, this is why. I'm not stalking any of you. Sorry to disappoint.

Now and then I search for subjects on this forum to see what has been discussed. Some of the past users really had some interesting insights, great senses of humor, and really demonstrated their unique character. I can see why you miss them so much. It would have been nice to chat with them.

Well, what does the Bible say? That's where I would look first.

Welcome to the forum! This subject has been covered in length multiple times before. Feel free to click the search button and search any subjects that you would like to learn about or discuss.

I saw a video somewhere that showed short clips of the people in charge of departments of health all over the west. This included people all over Europe, U.S., Canada, and so on. Some were at the federal level, some were at the state level, and some were at the city level. The majority were...

Welcome to Interfaith!

When it comes to beliefs (religious, political, etc.) I have taught my step-daughter the following: 1. Are the people of this group honest? If not, they're not worth your time. 2. Are the people of this group happy? Do you see a lot of laughter amongst their friends? Do the people of this...

I'm not disagreeing with you. Just pointing out the logic behind the idea that Q, if it existed, was written down. It's a lot of writing that was apparently written down verbatim. I can't even prove if Q source existed, much less prove if it was oral tradition or written scripture.

Thanks for the elaboration Thomas. As I stated to Wil earlier, I'm going off of my memory of research from 25 years ago. I don't know of any "scholars" that claimed that the Q source was Jesus Himself. I just recall believers making the claim that Jesus was the Q source (not a written source...

Wil, it has been 25 years since I researched this topic. I'm going off of memory. My understanding wasn't that Jesus wrote the Q source, He WAS the Q source for some believers. My point is simple. If a Q source did indeed exist, the "Gospel of Thomas" didn't quote it. It quoted many...

Perhaps. However it is amazing that Matthew and Luke would at times, word for word, have the exact same account from an oral source. Not impossible, but not probable.

Same toy math applies to toddlers as well!

Welcome!

My apologies. It seemed to me like you were trying to push the Gospel of John to a later date while trying to push the "Gospel of Thomas" to an earlier date. If that was not your intention than I apologize. "Q source" is the source that scholars believe the 4 gospels came from. Believers see...

Your comparison is better than my Pluto comparison.

As I told Wil, this would be a nice subject to either bump or start over on a thread. I'm super busy with my kids right now, so I'm sure Thomas would have a wealth of information on this subject. As would others. I don't want to get off the subject of Thomas right now.

And bats were probably considered birds by scientists at one time... so are we defending old classifications now? Not trying to stoke an old debate, just seeing some irony here. My comparison was simple. Trying to make the claim that the "Gospel of Thomas" is the exact same type of source as...

I find it funny that you do whatever you can to try to push the date of authorship of the 4 gospels to a later date... while trying to shove the Gospel of Thomas to an earlier date. Even the biggest skeptics of the 4 gospels admit they had some sort of Q source. At the same time the biggest...

1. I "refuse" Mark and Luke? Mark wasn't one of the 12 but he was Simon Peter's close colleague who followed him around during the events of the gospels. Therefore a witness. Luke admits that he didn't witness all of the events of the gospels. But he makes no such disclaimer about the book...