Search results

not sure where my post went, fulfilled not abolished, the Laws were given to Jews not to Gentiles. you should read the New Testament its quite good, Paul talks a lot about the law and its application to Gentile Christians. is that the Bagavad Gita ? i have a copy somewhere...

stumbling off, is your path I guess.

not at all, its obvious really, the laws from Deuteronomy were given to the Jews not to Gentiles, seems so obvious to me. the Old Testament is pretty full on, you can make of it what you like. my understanding of the Law in in Christianity, is that Jesus fulfilled the Law he did not...

hope you dont mind if I step in here as well, the Old Testament law was for Old Testament Jews not for todays Gentile Christians, so it never applied anyway, thats my view anyway.

but its not evidence is it ?

thats not evidence, thats your belief. the various versions of the Bible are all myth and legend with a smattering of history,. and contains no evidence to back your opinion, show me one piece of credible evidence to backup your claim. as for showing you another book that is impartial...

sounds about right tome

yeah i see what you mean, although some books are more credible as evidence than others. if we talking history then if Jesus was married where is the historical evidence for this ? the the bible is a collection of stories, there maybe some historical truth but its not gospel :rolleyes: and...

I dont see what the fuss is really God or G!d makes no difference really that I can see. But the name Jesus, well that was not even his name was it, wasnt his name Yeshua or Joshua ? So why do we call him Jesus ?

The Bible is not evidence of anything really.

does not matter to me :rolleyes:

so where is the EVIDENCE ? or did I miss it ?

Hi Will. From atheist to agnostic, to muslim to christian, with interests in budhism and advaita and paganism, mostly I am a collection of habits and fears which is what I call myself, spiritually I am leaning towards non duality these days, i still pray to an external god though when I am...

oh yeah right, Deuter 13

I disagree its plain and simple religious bigotry. plenty of salafis wahabis are also sunnis.

not quite right salafi and wahabi are sunni muslims.

i would say that this contains a lot of mis-information and the author is trying bolster the already inflated sense of victimhood amongst the ummah.

nice cup and pasted job. do you have a position on sin in Christianity thats your own >

slightly different in Christianity

Wahhabism is a reactionary movement against the excesses of Sufism, although its just a form of Sunni Islam really. The main problem I see is that its so well funded to spread its fundamentalist slant on Sunni Islam, which is already pretty extreme world wide which is dangerous and does not...