Search results

Sorry I will answer briefly to let you know I have read them in future. A Classification is: it is hard to say Paul is Anti-Christ and leave out John as then people use Johns wording as if Yeshua said it him self. Which I now believe he didn't as there are to many things that Contradict his...

Well if John is mostly made up, then what Christ says must be repeated in more then one gospel, as other wise he never said it. Especial some of the important things, as the disciple would not have missed them. Peace N love B with U

Its Paul and John!!! As I am discussing on here and on other forums most Jews will not accept Christ, as the gospel of John is made up by the Pharisee to discredit him. Any one brought up within Jewish customs will find it hard to accept what is written in John, as it portrays Christ as God...

I see you are trying and I appreciate that, yet we can not if this is to be a true court case, take the words of the defendants as such and use them on the side of the prosecution. If that makes sense; using words and scripture taken from John and Paul can not be used as Christ said them. If...

Its time to stop guessing who or when, it does say the beast is, was and is not. It is…………Paul (Saul), John Nicodemus (Nicolaitans) and Simon Peter (stone) their doctrine is Anti-Christ, even though they believed it not to be and others do. Yet all the way through what they have written with a...

I did think I had posted this earlier, yet I can find it now, Christianity is world wide as it has been enforced and those who have disagreed get deleted. Unlike as Christ told people: It’s a shame they didn’t spread Christ’s teachings more then Pharisee (Paul and John). As the world...

Paul believed as the Pharisees had, that by Christ’s death, he could be made a sin offering for the world. To understand Paul’s statement about the end of the law, you have to have a look at the Jewish customs, that if you had sinned you made a sin offering and then you would be free of sin. So...

I will be happy to do so. There is a lot to add though if you can imagine as this is a big court case. Thank you for moving it to the appropriate forum, at first I thought you had deleted it and almost cried o0(oh not here as well)

Ok, to centralize this whole topic, I have started a new thread to take not only Paul yet also John to court, with references. I have spent along time researching this and here are some of the findings. http://www.comparative-religion.com/forum/showthread.php?p=42880

Now within the book of John there are many points that not only contradict Yeshua from what we see in the other gospels written by the disciples, yet also the rest of the Bible. Unlike the other gospels where Yeshua is shown to know the Bible and use it as it was meant; reiterating a lot of the...

A big factor as well, to say that John is not the disciple, is the fact the disciple went up the mountain with Yeshua and met Elijah and Moses; this is not included in the gospel of John. Instead we have all points that only a Pharisee would have known, making it quite clear that this is not the...

The next part to all of this is that, as I have been finding when I have been going around Christian forums; they always quote John back at me and say yet John says. Now many of us have been taught to believe that John was the disciple, yet while I was re-reading over the gospels I realise...

Here is a list of some of the people who have seen this, there maybe more: In the excellent book Christ or Paul?, the Rev. V.A. Holmes-Gore wrote: The great theologian Soren Kierkegaard, writing in The Journals, echoes the above sentiment: The brilliant theologian Ernest Renan, in his...

Considering how many posts there are all over this forum questioning Christianity, I will start a new one, as a centralized one. I see on this forum many intelligent scholars and since most Christians, do not wish to hear this, I feel this is probably a better place to say this and discuss...