Search results

The Sublime Buddha gave teachings and trainings for householder as well, those still attached to sensuality, but vehemently urged not to go into "householder-equanimity" as such is the base for grave lose. Nevertheless, may good householder strive at least for the Brahmacariya, especially when...

So if not needing to gain pleasure, some beyond the common low, why then going after it. Certain, there is no wise way of using sensuality and means of distraction for short and low release, good householder.

What's the use of harmful, and why should one with no resolves toward harm, practice such?

Life is certain a misery if needing intoxications to find joy, good householder. But if the teacher of yours was a sensuality enjoying drunkard, than no much need to think that those bond to such would be able to strive for anything beyond sensual realms. The realms of steady desiring and seeking.

My persons fault, shared the wrong topic: Origin of Creator-God religions. And not really any desires to discuss. Just thought make useful for serious investigations and good grow, good householder.

One shouldn't forget that dark skin isn't favored is east and Asia as well. The whiter, the brighter. So it's not at all necessary to assume it's just western marketing. Dark skin means low and poor. The opposite, modern world cherishes poor and not-blessed looking. So that's more the reason...

It would be better to take the Buddhas account on the view of Reunion in account and build up, if wishing to refute it, on it: Buddha vs. Jesus (comparative study) (quote in OP).

Good householder might forget that Jesus comes from the east as well, just another of the countless Brahmanic version of union with an almighty Supernatural being, phenomena. As for where going: aside of just wishing, the right conducts and practice is necessary, next to a wise choice of what...

There is no such as xy-tradition, good householder. Simply this Dhamma-Vinaya (which was the Sublime Buddhas given name) of the Buddha, and no allowance of any update or new release. And further, the Sublime Buddha has no intent to hinder anybody in gaining Union with beloved God, the opposite...

On association with evil friend and effects of intoxications even in the present existence: Sigalovada Sutta: The Discourse to Sigala

Not a single aside of wishing wasting past done merits and a blessed existence as human being, good householder.

That not something deprived from the Sublime Buddha, but ideas of sects who have "Jesus-symptoms", Mohayana... That's also why this Sects who use the name of the Buddha are much more popular in western world. How it comes about that there are priests declaring a creater God was already supplied...

Good householder is free to go where he/she likes to. My person just tell of which way leads to good and better, and which downwardly. It's householders own goodness and virtue he/she needs to explore and hold on much, to have all reason to no more need intoxications to walk on good and joyful...

So even straight toward misery... Conceit is actually already a burden, but used, if good conceit, to get ride of conceit, yet if foolish conceit than there is no way to assist to better. Good householder holds firm on one of the devastating views of the Jains and even that much deluded to...

Just for encouragement and to increase good base: Pāṭaligāma Sutta: At Pāṭali Village

Nobody would need to do such since good householder simply isn't. He just cherishes the cherries he picked out which serve his ditthi-anusaya and sensual-craving.

But still holding money, trade, don't live the holly life at a pure state. Why? Because still seeing pleasures of the senses as own, not willing to take what's own as refuge yet. And in this regard, it was said: more worse then an ox. Who not, if in face of losing, wouldn't give up what's not to...

Being fullmoon night, Uposatha (cleaning day, by taking on useful identifications and joy with one's goodness), Atma thought to open a good barrel.Muluposatha Sutta: The Roots of the Uposatha

No, maybe the other side around: they don't take them as their good disciples. That's why it was said, it's not possible to become real disciple of the Buddha by relaying on books and Wiki, since those just serve desired, never teach of what's actually required to let go, to grasp, for a good...

If not starting to do some good efforts, good householder is more worse than an Ox (who seems to have a lot of equanimity, but just that of an eating Ox), since even an ox, when the daylight fades, goes on faster, to reach house timely. Good householder is higher of his action, those are his...