Search results

Such would open up ways toward heavens, even Brahma world, in the case one likes to reap ease. muditā

It's hardly to imagined that anything that's objected beyond the sensesphere could be exoteric. Since such is neither common nor can be taken without simply in trust at first place. So esoteric is many used in certain preoccupied notion, mostly out of kind of envy of not being within the inner...

There are some who desire to give, good householder, some who know or trust that there is a way upwardly and beyond, but that's possible total the other way around than perceive-able, this something like food for ending food. One wouldn't go on at ease if the supply would be based on science...

Could it be not regarded as simply envy, if without real fountation, good householder? Again, yours invited the refute it. Simply saying "he must be bad" because lacking of any reasoning is pretty modern to substain firm holding on ignorance, but would such be regarded as intelligent, a real...

So well then, may good householder tell of which science does not simply serve and exist on and for this or that gross worldly gain. Which doesn't serve the food chains (suffering and stress) in the sensual world by feeding on others for it's increase. There will be hardly any which even holds...

So they found how to let rain manna? Somebodies sensual ease requires many other beings death and pain, good householder. Certain it had increased manifold. What could good householder trace as good desire? It's not so that there aren't skilful desires, but what yours regard as intelligent is...

Positive for what? "Don't touch my failures and not-knowing" at least it's mine?" Santa Clause doesn't fall into the category of even intelligent. Not getting things isn't something inherent, and supply and support of defilements neither intelligent nor compassioned. Yes, science provide just...

Already a little on a good lane, but just a little, good householder.

Start to stop watching youtube and media, would immensely help good householder. Better to practice goodness then to consume.

Who's 's, good householder?

So yours venerate stones and Elephant head images, go along with dogs duties, while deny more sublime states of being? While stones have no Guṇa at all, and dogs certain low, gods and deities, even if common ones, have usually more that common people, eg. more than scientists, since they "sell"...

Correction, as misreaded Satva. Sacca, truth. It's wise to get familare with the Ariya-sacca The Four Noble Truths (cattari ariya saccani) , which are of course paramattha.

Nonsens. Nobody is hire of your deeds aside of good householder. While the idea of Kamma (action by body, speecy, mind), and here also of their fruits, comes for scientific delusions, it's right that nothing else that one's action can be rightly seen as own, and it's most importand to get that...

Abhivādana-sīlissa Niccaṃ vuḍḍhāpacāyino Cattāro dhammā vaḍḍhanti Āyu vaṇṇo sukhaṃ, balaṃ. For one of respectful nature who constantly honors the worthy, Four qualities increase: long life, beauty, happiness, strength.

Shiva and Indra as well, they are even Ariya-puggala, Noble follower, as well as many Brahmas, including Mahabrahma. Of course there are plenty of Gods and deities who don't gained the merits yet to be devoted to the Gems. And there are plenty of people fabricating a lot of selfish stories and...

That's good and called virtuous. Yet it's not because of a God that one acts virtuous or become an adulterer or one who goes after others beloved. Because it leads to inaction and gives way to deny responsibility. Then pray on that not meeting aging, sickness, death and disparity... or that...

Māra, "the killer", "the tempter", from the word maraṇā (death), which plays a similar role like Satan, is aside of the meaning as mental quality feeding defilements, actually the leader of the Devas ("angles") in the Happy realms, dwelling in the realms of "Gods in power of creation of others"...

That's pretty foolish, causes inaction and believes even that a fool is a fool because of a higher being. To know that nobody is able to work anothers way out, do the task for another, doesn't mean that one denys the existing of refined and higher existence and beings, nor is such a kind of...

Not always understanding, or not always gaining fruits from good labor? As for the second: that fruits do not akways appear right after, doesn't means that deeds are fruitless, good householder. Giving freedom, sharing goodwill, toward all beings is cause of what's called cettovimutti. Of course...

Good if getting aware of what one does himself, beside of doing hidding deeds behind a unreal subject. Hard enough, how then figure out other's doing, deeds.