Kind of a like the square - rectangle situation: all Priests are of the Levite clan; not all Levites are priests.
The base concern is that the Gospels do not represent first century Judaism very well (at least from a Pharisaic POV); therefore, there is a good chance that it's not very...
I apologize for over-stepping my bounds. I should have just said that there is no mention of Jesus in the Talmud. There are many passages that people try to tie to the Jesus of Christianity; yet, I have seen refutation after refutation regarding each and every supposed passage. Anyways...
Replacement Theology in a nutshell is an ideology that the Jews have been rejected by G-d and the Christian Church takes the place of Israel as the "nation of priests". This replacement has afforded the Christian Church all the blessings that are enumerated in the Torah, but none of the...
The Oral Torah is something that I believe every Christian should get a primer on, because it really helps to understand exactly what Torah is as a whole.
Oral Torah is the explanation that supports and clarifies the Written Torah. Anyways... it's a topic we should entertain more later...
I just got Caesar's Messiah by Joseph Atwill. His theory talks about Josephus and the Gospels. Maybe we should discuss that in the future, if you happen to read about it or the theory that he shares.
I can pretty much assure you that there is no mention of the Christian Jesus in the Talmud. ;)
A simple breakdown would be:
Priesthood => Sadducees.
Sages/Teachers => Pharisees.
I believe there are many "Day(s) of the L-rd" in Judaism. There is not just a singular situation. As for the Talmud and what it says regarding the renewing of the covenant, I cannot say. I'm not a Talmudic...
Steve:
I can't remember if I've asked you before, but are you very learned on the idea of Oral Torah?
But I have to also be honest with you, I don't think that is the direction that Q was coming from. I will await the answer though.
Are you familiar with Oral Torah?
Do you believe that Jesus "fulfilled" the Torah even though he broke commandments of Torah?
No offense taken there.
Would you like to discuss this passage in greater detail?
The Pharisees of the first century are, essentially, the equivalent of...
You've got me confused.
You made the statement:
And I asked what Scripture you're using to make that statement. Would you mind answering it again as the above doesn't seem to address it?
Thanks,
c
LOL! How true that statement is. I grew up in Marietta, OH, but I went to school at Eastern Michigan U. in Ypsi-tucky. I went because of a particular curriculum, but EMU also had a reciprocal relationship with U of Toledo where students from OH and MI would get in-state tuition.
I will...
LOL! I'm glad you could follow along with my humor. I find your viewpoint of Scripture to be rather interesting, and intriguing enough to hear about. I just hope you don't have a problem with me not just going along with your thoughts.
I don't see a "two-house" theology being taught from Jewish tradition in the book of Daniel. But I could be mistaken.
Daniel: as a book of prophesy.
Revelation: as a book of prophesy.
Ashamed to say that I was essentially a swallower of the "rapture pre-trib" pill.
It is true. Not all Jews have made aliyah to Israel.
Personally, I don't care too much for the "two-house" theology consideration. It, much like Messy-anic Christianity, has its own un-Judaic interpretation of the Tanakh.
That's an interesting way of looking at it, and I'd never really seen it like that before.
The closest thing that I can see being a blatant example of what you state is Replacement Theology. There are those who believe that the Church replaces the Jews as "Israel". The real felonious...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.