Search results

#1 I believe in science, I was linking you to scientists earlier. #2 I will look into the dating method you just posted as I am not familiar with that one.

Then why use it?

Tree experts also note that the organism's age cannot be determined with the level of precision found in tree rings; some claim Pando's age is closer to 1 million years. Part of the rationale behind current age estimates for aspen clones is that sexual reproduction is effectively frustrated...

I could just as easy argue that you are the parrot.

I have as many scientists saying what I am as you do saying what you are. Apologetics Press - An Ancient Earth?...Well, Not Exactly An article for you.

Apologetics Press - Dating in Archaeology: Radiocarbon & Tree-Ring Dating A good article on the subject.

There is no dating system that is 100% accurate that we currently have. Shell fish that have been caught off the ocean floor have been dated at 400+years old...

The link you posted discussed the tree being dated by tree rings and radiocarbon dating.

I don't know why the Bible doesn't mention them. There are many animals not mentioned in The Bible. I don't really put too much thought into them really.

You can ask me whatever you like. I was just curious of why you say my mind is shut and I am blowing things off while you do the same.

There are also flaws in tree ring dating as well. Even the article you posted hints that "if" the date is correct.

I have not blown anyone off. I have read the arguments for both and came to a decision about what I believe. By the way, you are quick to "blow off" evidence that doesn't fit your opinions. Just an observation.

My opinion is just that. My opinion. Just because it isn't the same as yours does not make it propaganda.

Not at all, it took a while for me to reach the point where I am. Unfortunately, I cannot provide links until my tenth post to support my positions. I am def not gonna copy/paste from these places. Too much info.

Wow, insulting me off the bat. Good for you. My opinion has been formed through living on this earth educating myself with what I believe to be the truth. Why should you care what my opinion is anyway?

You say your mind is open, but then when I say that the world isn't as old as you think it is, you blow off my opinion like it isn't founded. I am 39 and my opinion on this isssue has been changed before. Google "radiocarbon dating flaws" and tell me if you believe anyone knowsh

There are flaws with radiocarbon dating, and it's well-known. I tried to post a link to support this but I have to wait until my 10th post here to post that link. Why is it important to you how old I think the world is?

Somewhere between 6000-7000 years. The reason is because of things I have heard during my life regarding The Bible's timeline from too many places to name them all. There are flaws in radio-carbon dating things as well. I believe the earth was created in the literal 7 days. Pagan.

I was just translating the verse you asked about. I have no idea about these people. First, I don't believe there have been 197,000 years on earth for anyone. Secondly, how do you know if God hasn't appeared through dreams or other medium to those people. I have no idea.

He is talking of the gentiles(non-Jews) that have yet to hear His message of salvation. If they believe in Jesus, they will become part of the flock because He is the only way to heaven. This verse in no way implies non-believers will be in heaven. It is saying they will have a choice also.