Search results

You are right that Constantine didn't care what anyone believed, except maybe his good old mother. Like Nimrod, Constantine had a complex relationship with his mother. Constantine was into the consolidation of his political power. On the other hand, the church was relegated to the be eaten by...

The point is that the popes gave homage to Peter, Paul, and the cross. Yeshua didn't preach the gospel of the cross, and he certainly didn't teach that anyone was to be called leader of the church (Mt 23:10). As for Peter, he called Peter "Satan", and said he was a stumbling block. The Pope...

The Nicene Council was convened by Constantine, who was Pontifex Maximus, to bring the Arian debate to a conclusion. Initially he sided with Arius, but for political reasons he settled for the Trinity solution. On the other hand, the next emperor, his son, Constantinus, for faith reasons, threw...

The "seed" from which the good fruit springs is the "truth". You have good seed, which is the truth, and can produce good fruit, and you have the seed of tares, which produces bad fruit. You can determine whether the seed is good or bad by the fruit it produces. The fruit and the seed are...

Isaiah 8:20 is not about fruits. It is about the standard to determine who is speaking truth or a lie. Is 8:20," To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because they have no dawn."

Ben wrote: How could I leave the NT aside and consider it irrelevant when its main theme is to preach the replacement of Judaism by Christianity? We have lost many Jews to this Pauline policy already. If a Jew is forbidden to proselytize, at least, to work against that wave from outside, it...

Quote: Originally Posted by showme If you read the previous verse (v. 7) that reference of Isaiah is to the new Israel, the House of Jacob from the stock of Judah. (Isa. 48:1) This has been fulfilled since the new Israel was formed during those 130 years of moratorium when a few thousands from...

[COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]

Your master is either love or money. This expressed by Yeshua: Mt 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. As for Paul, I think he had several demons he...

The book of Revelation is paralleled by the Law and the prophets. Everything is in line with the Law and the prophets. It simply sheds light on to what the prophets were talking about. Paul on the other hand, undermines the Law and the prophets, and calls even the angels accursed if they should...

Your position is based on the assumption that you are of the family of God, whereas there are probably close to 32,000 different denominations, which many might considered you as being a member of the family of the deceived, and that you will "perish everlastingly". Athanasian Creed Or then...

The author’s intent is stated in Revelation 1:1,” The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his bond-servant, the things which must shortly take place;..” The imagery used may be different, but the events described are all the same. Any interpretation must fit all the...

To bypass your obfuscation of the standard Yeshua set for establishing a matter, which is based on the "living Word of God", Dt 19:15, which the unknown author of Hebrews thought he could do away with, I will use John 8:17, which states, "that the testimony of two men is true". The use in Mt...

It all depends on which quote you are relating too. Mostly I try to quote the testimony of Yeshua, witnessed by John, and if not in a hurry, will sometimes, but rarely add a second source. This is what Yeshua testified to as being how any matter is to be established (Mt 18:16 & Dt 19:15) Not by...

Feel free to tell what Revelation 13 and 17 actual relate to, especially since 6/8 of Revelation 17 is past tense. (Rev 17:10) Keep in mind your interpretation should parallel Daniel and fit into history.

The difference between Yeshua and Paul is that Yeshua taught the gospel of life, which is the kingdom of God, whereas Paul, taught his own gospel of Grace, the gospel based on death. Listen, I understand your predicament. You have been deceived by means of the beast with two horns like a...

There is little agreement within the Protestant church on any points, except maybe a majority agreement on the false doctrines of the Roman church, such as the Athanasian Creed. The mother Roman church was established around 1700 years ago, and now there around 32,000 denominations. Most which...

The Truth is not complicated, it is impossible if you try to shoe horn in Paul. As for being “perfect” like Yeshua, he already told you how (Mt 19:21). As for “atonement”, it probably would be more easily understood if spelled differently. Such as “at one ment”, or “at one with”. As for coming...