Search results

I think you are trying to fit God into your understanding of science. If a Christian does not accept the Bible as inerrant, then the question is what parts are in error and which parts are correct. That leaves God's word subject to carnal man's judgement, and worthless as the source of Christian...

You confuse spiritual with material. One is accepted by faith, the other is based on scientific demonstration. Too much literalism in matters of faith make it become a dogma that can be corrupted. I believe that spiritual writings are to be spiritually discerned. and physical matters...

Why not? The "Theory" of Evolution does not provide an answer to creation. It stops at "something from nothing" (The Big Bang). At that point you accept that something from nothing is possible if you want to call it a "belief", or you accept that a motive force (creator) is involved, or you...