St Thomas Aquinas

Thomas

So it goes ...
Veteran Member
Messages
15,342
Reaction score
4,862
Points
108
Location
London UK
Today in the calendar of the Catholic Church we celebrate St Thomas Aquinas.

Perhaps most famous for his philosophical works, the Summa Theologiae and the Summa Contra Gentiles, his genius as a dialectician is rightly acknolwdged, as is his benchmark deployment of Aristotelian philosophical principles in these two works — still discussed today in secular circles as exemplars of the method of philosophical debate.

What is not so well known however is that Aquinas was undoubtedly a Christian Neoplatonist — the two references he cites more than any other throughout his works are St Augustine and St Denys the pseudoAreopagite, two men whose theologies are profoundly Neoplatonic.

And furthermore that he was a mystic. St Thomas is known in the Church as the Doctor Angelicus, and his writings on angels is vast and deeply informed by his own first-hand experiences. It is interesting that his friend and contemporary, another Doctor of the Church, was St Bonaventure, the Doctor Seraphicus who is known more for his mysticism than his theology.

Both men lectured at the University in Paris in the 14th century ... they must have presented a formidable pair!

To a friends he declared that he had learned more in prayer and contemplation than he had acquired from men or books, and his biographers mention 'mysterious visitors' who came to encourage and enlighten him. The Blessed Virgin appeared to him, as did St Peter and St Paul to aid him in the interpretation of obscure passages in Isaias.

When he first entered the Dominican Order he was considered a dunderhead. It took the genius of another master, Albertus Magnus, to recognise his potential, and put him to work. Later, when he considered himself unworthy of the doctorate offered him, a 'venerable religious of his order' (supposedly St. Dominic) appeared to encourage him and suggested the text for his opening discourse!

Of course, much exaggeration accrues in such tales, but his ecstasies are mentioned by all his biographers, as are his abstractions in the presence of King Louis IX and of other distinguished visitors.

And St Bonaventure? Check back in July!

Thomas
 
At the end of his life, St. Thomas was urged to continue writing and refused, saying, "I can write no more. I have seen things that make my writings seem as straw." The greatest of all theologians had transcended theology.
 
Well, another reason is that his writings are just unspeakably dull, and if you haven't been raised in the tradition he takes for granted, it is difficult to rouse enough interest to wade through him.
 
Well, another reason is that his writings are just unspeakably dull, and if you haven't been raised in the tradition he takes for granted, it is difficult to rouse enough interest to wade through him.
The fiction writer Flannery O'Connor was devoted to his ideas.
(now her writings are unspeakably something, I don't know what exactly, she is not an easy read, many cannot bear her fiction)


 
Just an aside, but when theology is done properly, it can tend to be ... dull.

It's the same with proving a mathematical theorem, or any scientific theory ... one has to make the point, then list all the objections, then answer all the objections, then reiterate the point ... such works tend to walk back and forth over the same ground.

"Analogia Entis: Metaphysics – Original Structure and Universal Rhythm" by Erich Pryzwara is such a work.

Erich Przywara (1889 1972) was one of the preeminent Catholic theologians of his time and a profound influence on such people as Hans Urs von Balthasar and Joseph Ratzinger, he has remained virtually unknown in North America. Analogia Entis, originally published in 1932 passed without notice.

The concept of analogia entis is the analogy between God and creation – covering the underlying unity of being consciousness and existence, the nature of the relationship between creature and Creator ... but, oh, good grief, one of those books that requires an act of will to continue reading, and one read in the awareness that perhaps 95% of the content has passed me by ....

+++

It's said everyone bought Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" but no-one read it. Well I did, from cover to cover. Did I understand it? Good Lord, no! Did I get anything from it? One thing. Just one thing only ... that rather than imagining the beginning of time being some discreet point, expanding outward, rather at the moment the 'discreet point' appeared, the whole shebang appeared too ... a bit of 'everything, everywhere, all at once' ...

+++

So when I hear of 'best selling' theology, I cannot help but draw some inhospitable conclusions.

(I say so advisedly – although tragically it would appear that some noteworthy university publishing houses are only too happy to publish such materials in pursuit of sales rather than scholarship.)
 
Back
Top