tychomorpheus
Established Member
- Messages
- 43
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Hi all. What do you know about the egyptian history of amonites VS atonites?
I have had some resources online that i've studied about Akenaten and the religious reform. Here is a base start:
In an online book about the philosophy of power called Teugma i've read:
"Direct experience – direct knowledge, an intense and painful learning, the coming of the individualised man out of the cocoon of preconceptions and the meeting of the reality beyond its representation – the Path of Aton."
"Energy and creation on the amonite Path, conscience and resorbtion on the atonite Path – the terms used must express the Path. Therefore they cannot be identical."
In an onlin essay of Immanuel Velikovsky:
"One is usually told that Amon was a solar deity and that Aten was also a solar deity. thus it comes to a rather unclear reform: one deity that symbolized the sun was rjeected and another deity that suymbolized also the sun was elected"
In Teugma again:
"Direct experience – direct knowledge, an intense and painful learning, the coming of the individualised man out of the cocoon of preconceptions and the meeting of the reality beyond its representation – the Path of Aton. The road to God is not behind, but only in the front – the old bridges broke and they cannot be used anymore, it is not a reason for sadness, but for joy. Even when going back, we do not take the same way at all.
Individuality implies two distinct aspects: the unity of the being, according to the model of the Supreme Being, and the limitation resulting from the apparent separation from the Supreme Being. The limitation is the obstacle that both the amonite and the atonite practices fight against. The essential difference refers to the respect of the unity of the being. The amonite practices deny individuality, leading to dissolution and involution, while the atonite practices assert individuality as an icon of God’s unity. "
Feedback?
Thanks,
I have had some resources online that i've studied about Akenaten and the religious reform. Here is a base start:
In an online book about the philosophy of power called Teugma i've read:
"Direct experience – direct knowledge, an intense and painful learning, the coming of the individualised man out of the cocoon of preconceptions and the meeting of the reality beyond its representation – the Path of Aton."
"Energy and creation on the amonite Path, conscience and resorbtion on the atonite Path – the terms used must express the Path. Therefore they cannot be identical."
In an onlin essay of Immanuel Velikovsky:
"One is usually told that Amon was a solar deity and that Aten was also a solar deity. thus it comes to a rather unclear reform: one deity that symbolized the sun was rjeected and another deity that suymbolized also the sun was elected"
In Teugma again:
"Direct experience – direct knowledge, an intense and painful learning, the coming of the individualised man out of the cocoon of preconceptions and the meeting of the reality beyond its representation – the Path of Aton. The road to God is not behind, but only in the front – the old bridges broke and they cannot be used anymore, it is not a reason for sadness, but for joy. Even when going back, we do not take the same way at all.
Individuality implies two distinct aspects: the unity of the being, according to the model of the Supreme Being, and the limitation resulting from the apparent separation from the Supreme Being. The limitation is the obstacle that both the amonite and the atonite practices fight against. The essential difference refers to the respect of the unity of the being. The amonite practices deny individuality, leading to dissolution and involution, while the atonite practices assert individuality as an icon of God’s unity. "
Feedback?