I would have thought if the evidence was there, other scholars would have commented. There seems to be nothing ... and the archaeological evidence so far concerning Luke is that where often he was thought to be wrong, finds turn up to show he was right – persons and places were disputed until the finds showed up – so I'd say the consensus is still with Luke and the Tradition.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.