Rational Bible

Nicholas Weeks

Nicholas Weeks

Bodhicitta
Messages
1,305
Reaction score
287
Points
83
Location
California
Just beginning to read Dennis Prager's commentary on Exodus. His second volume of the Torah, on Genesis will be released in early May.

Anyone else read the Exodus volume?
 
Nicholas Weeks said:
Just beginning to read Dennis Prager's commentary on Exodus. His second volume of the Torah, on Genesis will be released in early May.

Anyone else read the Exodus volume?
Click to expand...
I've read parts of it. I did not think much of it, but then I've really never been a fan of Prager.

L'shalom.
 
From Prager's Introduction where he mentions his main audience is the secular majority:

"I have had you most in mind when writing this commentary. With every passing generation in the West, fewer and fewer people believe in God, let alone in the Bible. This is a catastrophe for the West, and it is a tragedy for you. Having God, religion, a religious community, and a sacred text in one’s life enables one to have a far deeper and richer—not to mention wiser—life. If you keep an open mind when reading this commentary, that life will, hopefully, become appealing to you.

To readers outside of the West, the Torah has as much to say to you as to anyone in the West. I look forward to your reactions. They will surely influence my writing of the subsequent volumes.

In writing this commentary, I have no hidden agenda. My agenda is completely open: I want as many people as possible to take the Torah seriously, to entertain the possibility it is God-given, or, at the very least, to understand why so many rational people do."

This motivation is excellent and one hopes most secular, atheistic readers will find inspiration from this book and the Genesis volume coming up.
 
Last edited:
@Nicholas Weeks -

If you derive benefit from it, that's great. Speaking for myself - and only for myself - I can not recommend the book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wil
Ahanu said:
I haven't, but I would like to read more about how reading this commentary is benefiting you.
Click to expand...

Since the last time I read Exodus closely was about 60 years ago, it all is fresh now, thanks to Prager.

Little things like the Egyptian Princess who found & saved baby Moses, while ignoring her father's edict that all boy babies should be killed. One forgets that not all Egyptian royalty were monsters, nor were all Jews good. Prager points out that the Torah is not a sectarian tract that portrays Jews as always noble & good & their enemies as always bad people.
 
Walking in on something I know nothing about yet am perfectly willing to comment on is my forte. That being said.
RabbiO said:
I can not recommend the book.
Click to expand...
Can you post a particular interpretation or quote from the book that you have an objection and how your or conventional interp you feel is more appropriate or better?

I am asking twofold. One this very discussion and your curt unsubstantiated dismissal actually makes me interested in the book and author if only to find out what elicited such a response. (Like a preacher telling us not to go to a movie, or we should avoid premarital sex, I think think this has always caused many curiosity) . and second, I am just curious as to the two comments you've made since both lack any reasoning other than "I don't like salt on my food"

Thanx
 
Nicholas Weeks said:
Prager points out that the Torah is not a sectarian tract that portrays Jews as always noble & good & their enemies as always bad people.
Click to expand...

He underscores this point big time, saying being self-critical of their own people proves Jews follow a divine power . . . but then goes on to say other cultures lacked such self-critical introspection in their myths and other religious discourses . . .

Hold up . . . let me find where he said that.
 
 
Last edited:
Nicholas Weeks said:
Little things like the Egyptian Princess who found & saved baby Moses, while ignoring her father's edict that all boy babies should be killed.
Click to expand...
Does he mention this narrative motif is nearly universal in the stories of those who rise from obscurity to become great leaders?

Karna is a character in the Hindu "Mahabharata". He is the son of the Sun deity, born to an unmarried teenage princess, who hides the pregnancy, then out of shame abandons Karna in a basket on a river.

Sargon of Akkad (c2400-2300BC) was a founder of an ancient Mesopotamian empire. His birth is described:
"My mother was a high priestess, my father I knew not... My high priestess mother conceived me, in secret she bore me. She set me in a basket of rushes, with bitumen she sealed my lid. She cast me into the river (Euphrates) which rose over me. The river bore me up and carried me to..."
 
Thomas said:
Does he mention this narrative motif is nearly universal in the stories of those who rise from obscurity to become great leaders?
Click to expand...

Shocking that a commentary on the Torah, by a Jew, is not an interfaith (or theosophical) document. What an insight Thomas.:rolleyes:
 
wil said:
Walking in on something I know nothing about yet am perfectly willing to comment on is my forte. That being said. Can you post a particular interpretation or quote from the book that you have an objection and how your or conventional interp you feel is more appropriate or better?

I am asking twofold. One this very discussion and your curt unsubstantiated dismissal actually makes me interested in the book and author if only to find out what elicited such a response. (Like a preacher telling us not to go to a movie, or we should avoid premarital sex, I think think this has always caused many curiosity) . and second, I am just curious as to the two comments you've made since both lack any reasoning other than "I don't like salt on my food"

Thanx
Click to expand...

I will, but it will have to wait awhile. My arm is still healing and if I write more than 3 or 4 sentences the pain becomes tremendous. Believe me, I'm just as frustrated, more actually, than you are!
 
RabbiO said:
I will, but it will have to wait awhile. My arm is still healing and if I write more than 3 or 4 sentences the pain becomes tremendous.
Click to expand...

Prager's 'rational' explanation of Ex 4:21 - the Lord's stiffening or hardening of the Pharaoh's heart - does not make sense to me. So when you can type without pain, hope you will give another, better explanation.

21 And the Lord said to Moses, “When you go back to Egypt, see that you do before Pharaoh all the miracles which I have put in your power; but I will harden his heart, so that he will not let the people go.

This explanation by Adam Clarke on verse 21 makes more sense:

http://classic.studylight.org/com/acc/view.cgi?book=ex&chapter=004
 
Last edited:
Nicholas Weeks said:
Shocking that a commentary on the Torah, by a Jew, is not an interfaith (or theosophical) document. What an insight Thomas.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
I was rather hoping, if this is to appeal to 'secular, atheistic readers', then it would be obliged to cover their arguments, and not found its claims on subjective and somewhat dubious statements, such as "constantly berates the Jews for their flawed behavior. No holy work of any other religion is so critical of the religious group affiliated with that holy work."
Because it misses the point, that the scribe was calling the diaspora back to the religion of their forefathers.

It's not uncommon. Trump, for example, has the rallying cry 'make America great again'. When this project shows signs of failure, Trump will turn on the populace and blame them for it, 'you've brought this on yourselves', which is what the scribe was saying was the cause of Israel's ills.

"... There is no other bible on Earth where its protagonists are negatively portrayed... "
I am not sure, but I have a feeling this is factually incorrect.

"... No Greek would have written about bad Greeks..." LOL. I know for a fact that is nonsense. has he heard of Plato, and his commentary on the occupants of Olympus? Or the satires of Aristophanes?

+++

To be clear, the historical background and literary-critical insights into the sources and origins of Scripture detract from Scripture for me. Rather it places the text in its milieu and sheds light on its intuition/insight/inspiration/revelation.
 
Dennis Prager is a sage-like influence for millions, here is the first of his PragerU videos on the Ten Statements:

 
Billions of people believe in a Supreme Being or God as The Authority for how to live a good life. Yet as Prager admits, living a good life does not require belief in God. He says, as do countless Imams & Preachers & Cardinals & Rabbis, that to know for certain, only an All Wise God can know - thus the words from God are the infallible guide.

Of course, for those who know or believe in the law of Karma & Rebirth, God or gods are not necessary nor infallible. Yet, these Ten Statements are an adequate guide for billions of people.
 
Thomas said:
Oh dear ... he's some guy, isn't he?
Click to expand...
I used to listen to his radio show. He presents himself as a political conservative while also seeming centrist and reasonable, and I like to listen to a variety of viewpoints. However in recent years he seems to have gone off the deep end.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top