i'm sorry, kelcie, if that was the impression given. you are quite right to bring this up. just so you know; i am committed to interfaith *dialogue*. dialogue, in my book (and as far as i am aware this is in accordance with board policy, i'm sure brian will comment if necessary) is an encounter between people with no agenda other than understanding and education. certain groups or individuals may have their own agenda which is not entirely congruent with dialogue, but apart from a small number of exceptions, this usually does not prevent some kind of meaningful encounter which will hopefully help to educate them out of their ignorance. similarly, there are people who are fairly dogmatic about their own particular bonnet-bee, which may make them irritating, but doesn't preclude them from making a useful contribution.
unfortunately there are some individuals and groups whose beliefs and practices are entirely incompatible with both the spirit and practice of dialogue. this is based upon both reason and, i'm sorry to say, experience. it's not a long list and the various moderators have slightly different takes on who ought to be on it, but just to give you a quick idea:
1) fascists and neo-nazis
2) witnessers (by which i mean the "you're completely wrong, in the service of the devil and going to hell unless you agree with me and/or convert" kind of christian or muslim)
3) new age prophets who are here to give us all a message from the Divine and start their own religion
4) stealth evangelists (by which i mean people who dishonestly purport to be one thing and are in fact another - messianics, or jews for jesus to give them their correct name are one example of this, in that their entire intention is to convert jews to christianity by pretending to act like jews. they are funded by a network of christian evangelical organisations and target us specifically for this purpose, using every trick in the book to do so)
the relativist argument that says that every point of view is equally valid must have some limits. these are they, imho. if such people come to the judaism board, i will either directly refute them or have them banned. if they go to the christianity or islam board, i will do so there and/or bring it to the attention of the moderators. either way it will be discussed in the moderator "staff room". there is no place for such behaviour within interfaith dialogue.
there is another very small and precise group who i am specifically religiously prohibited from talking to, which is that of true idol-worshippers in the biblical sense (as opposed to neo-pagans or satanists or whoever, who tend to be lovely people). i have only encountered one such person in 7 years of web dialogue, fortunately and it was extremely unpleasant and, not surprisingly, ended up as anti-semitic.
basically, although i moderate, i also participate in discussion. when i see something being said that is either wrong (intentionally or not) or ignorant i try to challenge and rectify it. certain people, however, get the rough edge of my, er, keyboard. please don't think that i do this to everybody - although i can certainly be caustic at times.
b'shalom
bananabrain