Jibran
Peace
Peace,
Here is a very interesting excerpt from a book I am reading and just felt like sharing with folks here.
"During the 1670s, he (Newton) began a serious theological study of the doctrine of the Trinity and came to the conclusion that it had been foisted on the Church by Athanasius (1) in a specious bid for pagan converts. Arius (2) had been right: Jesus Christ had certainly not been God and those passages of the New Testament that were used to 'prove' the doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation were spurious. Athanasius and his colleagues had forged them and added them to the canon of scripture, thus appealing to the base, primitive fantasies of the masses.
"Tis the temper of the hot and superstitious part of mankind in matters of religion ever to be fond of mysteries, and for that reason, to like best what they understand least."
In his book called The Philosophical Origins of Gentile Theology, Newton argued that Noah had founded the primordial religion....that had advocated a rational worship of One God. Later generations have corrupted this pure religion....and had fallen back into idolatry and superstitious. Yet God had sent a succession of prophets to put them back on course. Jesus had been one of these prophets sent to call mankind back to the truth but his pure religion had been corrupted by Athanasius and his cohorts.
"This strange religion of ye West, 'the cult of three equal Gods'- as the abomination of desolation." (Isaac Newton)
*****
1. Athanasius and his-like advoated the doctrine of Trinity, Incarnation etc Check this link for detailed info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athanasius_of_Alexandria
2. Arius and group was against the Athanasius' teachings as you have read in the excerpt above. here is a link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arius
*****
From: "A History of God", by Karen Armstrong, pg 350-351
Here is a very interesting excerpt from a book I am reading and just felt like sharing with folks here.
"During the 1670s, he (Newton) began a serious theological study of the doctrine of the Trinity and came to the conclusion that it had been foisted on the Church by Athanasius (1) in a specious bid for pagan converts. Arius (2) had been right: Jesus Christ had certainly not been God and those passages of the New Testament that were used to 'prove' the doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation were spurious. Athanasius and his colleagues had forged them and added them to the canon of scripture, thus appealing to the base, primitive fantasies of the masses.
"Tis the temper of the hot and superstitious part of mankind in matters of religion ever to be fond of mysteries, and for that reason, to like best what they understand least."
In his book called The Philosophical Origins of Gentile Theology, Newton argued that Noah had founded the primordial religion....that had advocated a rational worship of One God. Later generations have corrupted this pure religion....and had fallen back into idolatry and superstitious. Yet God had sent a succession of prophets to put them back on course. Jesus had been one of these prophets sent to call mankind back to the truth but his pure religion had been corrupted by Athanasius and his cohorts.
"This strange religion of ye West, 'the cult of three equal Gods'- as the abomination of desolation." (Isaac Newton)
*****
1. Athanasius and his-like advoated the doctrine of Trinity, Incarnation etc Check this link for detailed info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athanasius_of_Alexandria
2. Arius and group was against the Athanasius' teachings as you have read in the excerpt above. here is a link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arius
*****
From: "A History of God", by Karen Armstrong, pg 350-351