Light; breaking the rules

[Bishadi]

A structure can maintain a property of ‘light’

To observe this below then find the refraction resolution.

Optical phenomena in photonic and polaritonic crystals
Xiwen Wang, BostonCollege


Date: 2005

Abstract
Photonic crystals, also known as photonic band-gap materials, are periodic structures that have a
band gap that forbids propagation of a certain frequency range of light. The richness of the
photonic band structures due to the periodicity of the permittivity also enables one to control light
with amazing facility and produces effects that are impossible with conventional optics. These
novel optical phenomena include negative refraction, subwavelength lensing, and rapid photon flux
switching, etc., which are the main results of this thesis.
We first demonstrate the unrestricted negative refraction and lensing effects in a two dimensional
triangular photonic crystal. In a particular frequency range, this kind of photonic crystal acts as a
real left handed metamaterial, with an effective refractive index neff = -1, therefore, the Veselago-
Pendry superlensing effect that overcomes the classical diffraction limit is realized. We further
propose a systematic way to increase this resolution, at an essentially fixed frequency, by
employing a hierarchy of crystals of the same structure, and the same lattice constant, but with an
increasingly complex basis. Secondly, we study the surface and disorder effects on this lens. We
show that, excitation of surface modes helps the transmission of evanescent waves which
facilitates the subwavelength lensing effect. Thirdly, we show that these novel effects can occur in
the optical frequency regime in a two-dimensional polaritonic crystal. Fourthly, we propose a rapid
photon flux switching in a two dimensional photonic crystal by using defects in an otherwise
perfect crystal. This defect localization can result in a sharp transition between the state of the
out-of-plane light propagation through the entire photonic crystal, and the state in which light
propagates only along the defect channels

that is a structure and what it does to light and below is another observance

(Noncanonical) field quantization by means of a single harmonic oscillator

Marelk Czachor
Katedra Fizyki Teoretycznej i Metod Matematycznych
Politechnika Gda´nska, ul. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-952 Gda´nsk, Poland
and
Arnold Sommerferld Instit¨ut f¨ur Mathematische Physik
Technische Universit¨at Clausthal, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany

A new scheme of field quantization is proposed. Instead of associating with different frequencies
different oscillators we begin with a single oscillator that can exist in a (quantum) superposition of
different frequencies. The idea is applied to the electromagnetic radiation field and nonrelativistic
quantum optics. Employing a Dirac-type mode-quantization of the electromagnetic field and using
a single oscillator we obtain several standard properties such as coherent states or spontaneous
and stimulated emission.

Was quantum approach in which ‘Coherence’ can be acheived………. A collective combing into a resonance; basically aligning a set of entries into a combined coherent potential and can be used to reach a threshold. Think in the eyes if we watched a movie (individual scenes) and afterwards came out with an overall theme. Or simply a baseball team combining to win a game; bad news bears.

Then another in FRET

The mechanism of fluorescence resonance energy transfer involves a donor fluorophore in an excited electronic state, which may transfer its excitation energy to a nearby acceptor chromophore in a non-radiative fashion through long-range dipole-dipole interactions. The theory supporting energy transfer is based on the concept of treating an excited fluorophore as an oscillating dipole that can undergo an energy exchange with a second dipole having a similar resonance frequency. In this regard, resonance energy transfer is analogous to the behavior of coupled oscillators, such as a pair of tuning forks vibrating at the same frequency. In contrast, radiative energy transfer requires emission and reabsorption of a photon and depends on the physical dimensions and optical properties of the specimen, as well as the geometry of the container and the wavefront pathways. Unlike radiative mechanisms, resonance energy transfer can yield a significant amount of structural information concerning the donor-acceptor pair.
Resonance energy transfer is not sensitive to the surrounding solvent shell of a fluorophore, and thus, produces molecular information unique to that revealed by solvent-dependent events, such as fluorescence quenching, excited-state reactions, solvent relaxation, or anisotropic measurements. The major solvent impact on fluorophores involved in resonance energy transfer is the effect on spectral properties of the donor and acceptor. Non-radiative energy transfer occurs over much longer distances than short-range solvent effects, and the dielectric nature of constituents (solvent and host macromolecule) positioned between the involved fluorophores has very little influence on the efficacy of resonance energy transfer, which depends primarily on the distance between the donor and acceptor fluorophore.
The phenomenon of fluorescence resonance energy transfer is not mediated by photon emission, and furthermore, does not even require the acceptor chromophore to be fluorescent

Which shares how energy can transfer to another structure.

Now does anyone see anything here between these areas of study? It is the energy in light that is being observed and how the mass is associating and exchanging energy and coherence of the wavelengths in a progression.

That progression is what ‘light’ does naturally and when upon mass, they combine to do just that. i.e…… put your ear to a conch shell. Do you hear anything?

Well now you know why. The mass captures energy from its surroundings and increases its potential/resonance.

Return to the structural make up of a conch … note the 1.618 (spiral) based on the golden ratio…… an inert ‘growth’ abusing the 2nd law of thermodynamic or that chaotic entropic mess of today’s paradigm.

What these publications share is a huge set of rules are broken. One is that light is never allowed to stop and be held on mass. Which is purely incorrect and one of the items they told me in 82’. Second that coherence can be achieved of light by mass. And third; a progression against the rules of current paradigm; entropy of the ‘living process’




absolutely non-canonical