Recent content by wil

I suppose that is the answer...all of them you see as valid Christian Mystics? I mean they didn't add Charles Filmore or Edgar Cayce...well that is until I asked... Yes, both Charles Fillmore and Edgar Cayce are often considered Christian mystics, though their approaches and specific beliefs...

Nod and smile.

@Thomas tell me how ai did Christian mysticism has a rich and diverse history, with countless figures who have sought a direct and personal experience of the Divine. Here are some prominent Christian mystics from the past, spanning various eras and traditions: Early and Medieval Period: *...

How absolutely interfaith of you.

I recall using hemisync CDs at some point in the past... (I hope all the nods of understanding by old members doesn't cause an earthquake)

I read.. The use of the diminutive emphasizes that she was a young girl, possibly a teenager or even younger. For example, it's the same word used in Mark 5:42 and Matthew 9:24-25 to describe Jairus's 12-year-old daughter whom Jesus raises from the dead. This usage supports the understanding...

I got out the MBD, Parallel Bible and revealing word to fiddle my way thru the verse...then I asked ai to do it for me... This is a cut and paste from the reply without refining the prompt. * In this passage: This represents the ultimate triumph of the carnal mind over the spiritual truth...

I've always been pretty amazed.at the outlandish things my govt pursues ...tuskeegee , mkultra, radiation, infectious diseases... I question their methods.which makes me question their conclusions

A Declassified CIA report discussed. https://mix.com/!957121003694067712?via=wilallyn&utm_source=share&utm_campaign=organic&utm_medium=androidapp

This clown revels in, finds solace in, entertainment and enlightenment in nonsense! Expecting you to be on board with my beliefs is like expecting you or I to agree with the decisions of those that flew suicide missions on 9/11.. our decades of understanding our realities differ dramatically...

Absolutely true! However....I like the system! Red, pink, Grey, black! No more red letter bibles that literalists point to swearing Jesus said this and did that even when lacking evidence and out of character. Bias? Absolutely, like the authors of every book ever known pretty...

Yes, discredited by people that believe Jesus to be Son of G!d...or trinitarians that believe he was G!d on earth. Me thinks Thomas Jefferson would have liked the book and the seminar based on his rendition of the new testament a couple hundred years ago. Is it simply different people...

The five gospels is not a translation but a red letter bible...but instead.of.just read they have red for.we think jesus said that, pink for could be him, maybe paraphrased, Grey for doubt it, and black for naw, we.dont think it is

G!d is all there is...

I found this interesting. An updated NRSV seems to be his current bible of choice? Which is the bible Unity used... I'd be interested to hear what Dan thinks of the Lamsa, the Message, and the five gospels...but I can't find anything...yet.