Search results

amica, i think your problem is with people's ignorance, not with imprecise terminology. b'shalom bananabrain

er... not terribly informed about judaism as far as i can tell. b'shalom bananabrain

there aren't any women here, are there? RIGHT! mattathias son of deuteronomy... b'shalom bananabrain

princely: i hate to say it but you are not the messiah. you are a very naughty boy. who's coming to the stoning? b'shalom bananabrain

hiya sally and welcome back and, of course, we'd all VERY much like to hear what you think about the egyptian elections and current situation. my friend abu faris (who you would like very much) is blogging about it here: by the river - including all the latest on people like mona el-tahawy...

eis aqui este sambinha feito numa nota só outras notas vão entrar mas a base é uma só esta outra é conseqüência do que acabo de dizer como eu sou a conseqüência inevitável de ser mojobadshah! quanta gente existe por aí que fala tanto e não diz nada! b'shalom bananabrain

to quote terry jones: "Nietzsche! HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE!" or, alternatively, jeeves, to bertie wooster: "You would not enjoy Nietzsche, sir. He is fundamentally unsound." or, if you prefer, bertrand russell: "The whole of [Nietzsche’s] abuse of women is offered as self-evident truth...

that's right. there's a jolly good wiki entry on it: Talmud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia b'shalom bananabrain

well, yes, but i'm not going to get any understanding from the gnus for saying so, they'll just take it as an opportunity to be even more smug and dismissive rather than understanding. b'shalom bananabrain

indeed - it was Written in the style it was so it would be futureproofed against the way humans would develop; i personally find the cleverness with which this was done superhuman; i just don't see how humans could have done it; of course not everyone agrees with my assessment. yes, but not...

<moderator>you don't get to decide what is ok in a jewish forum. thread closed</moderator> b'shalom bananabrain

this is a website hosted in britain and has nothing to do with the US constitution. interfaith.org is privately owned and is not obliged to provide people like you with a platform to spout ill-digested claptrap. we have a code of conduct which is enforced by the moderators such as myself. i...

once again - stop with the jesus / angels stuff. this is the judaism forum. b'shalom bananabrain

Re: Question: Difference Between Mosaic Covenant and Patriarchal Covenant. Link to Ki ok - you've had your warning. thread closed. b'shalom bananabrain

he was a revolutionary (and in some ways heretical) reforming rabbi 2,000 years ago who got too popular and consequently fell foul of the machinery of roman state security. this "archangel michael" stuff is bollocks. if you keep going on about it i'm going to remove the posts. go and be mad...

ok, i have now had enough. i'm closing the thread and if you want to talk about this more, do so in "comparative religion". b'shalom bananabrain

Re: Question: Difference Between Mosaic Covenant and Patriarchal Covenant. Link to Ki whatever and whoever jesus was and is, he is someone you should be talking about in the "christianity" or "comparative religion" forums, not in the jewish forum. b'shalom bananabrain

Re: Question: Difference Between Mosaic Covenant and Patriarchal Covenant. Link to Ki oh, do bog off. that has nothing to do with this and, more to the point, nothing to do with our calendar. b'shalom bananabrain

"sometimes i just know things" - sheesh. why bother? i'm call this particular line of enquiry. i say it's bollocks. i will now maintain that you are a small purple handbag. i just "know". two points, about "bats are birds" - look, the Torah is *not* trying to define them scientifically. that...

i'm not arguing with any of that, but it is both more complex and more subtle than the conclusions you are drawing. indeed, but he will certainly not agree with your conclusions. like this, for example. there is no source for it. again, you provide no reason why any of this should be the...