reply to Brian
Good point Brian. In my use of separation I was referring more to the idea of separation from God a la the Fall myth. This separation contains the element of enmity. Campbell notes that the idea of separation from the spiritual realm emerged about 2000 BC. This was morphed into Fall mythology which had this element of people having angered the gods through broken taboos. Different cultures have a variety of these legends. In a Southeast Asian tribal group I worked with they believed that a young lady was pounding rice and hit the lowered heavens. IN response God pulled heaven up far away and shut the gates. Very similar to the OT version in that there was some offense and a response of shutting out humanity.
This idea of separation also has elements of the gods being located far away in the heavens which comes from the idea of the divine order being evident in the cosmos, the sun and moon ruling over the lesser lights. That hierarchical order was to be replicated on earth.
My point in noting the origins of these ideas is that if they are based on primitive misunderstanding of the nature of reality and life, then we are freed to find entirely new and more humane ways of understanding and defining the spiritual.
And most liberating- if there never was a separation of humanity from God, then there is no need for salvation and all the guilt, anxiety and fear that has burdened humanity in relation to salvation mythology.
But yes to your point that we have developed as something uniquely different from animal life. Consciousness is taking us in an entirely new and more humane direction. And that is the manifestation of transcendence in the universe. It is the ladder of progress that science recognizes more as integral to life. Just out of interest, see article in latest Atlantic Monthly 'ET and God' for update on scientific attitudes about this thing of design versus randomness.
I said:Hi wkrossa - and welcome to comparative-religion.com!
Glad to see you putting some of your ideas out - it certainly does make for some interesting reading.
If I may add something, though - on the issue of separation I don't disagree with what you are saying, but I do believe that a more fundamental separation was made apparent, which helped drive the entire sense of separation - and that's the difference between humanity and the other animals of nature.
Whatever the arguments as to what may or may not have consciousness and self-awareness, the simple fact remains that humanity can "create" - ie, shape the world in a pre-determined way that no other creature can. Hence we lay somewhere between the Natural and the Divine.
I see that issue - of the rational gifts of our humanity - that were the really engine for the belief in our separation from the Divine,
This is almost stated explicitly in the Book of Genesis, when Adam and Eve only realise their difference and sense of sense through eating fo the Tree of Knowledge - it is precisely because of knowledge that they are separated.
Possibly, anyway.
Good point Brian. In my use of separation I was referring more to the idea of separation from God a la the Fall myth. This separation contains the element of enmity. Campbell notes that the idea of separation from the spiritual realm emerged about 2000 BC. This was morphed into Fall mythology which had this element of people having angered the gods through broken taboos. Different cultures have a variety of these legends. In a Southeast Asian tribal group I worked with they believed that a young lady was pounding rice and hit the lowered heavens. IN response God pulled heaven up far away and shut the gates. Very similar to the OT version in that there was some offense and a response of shutting out humanity.
This idea of separation also has elements of the gods being located far away in the heavens which comes from the idea of the divine order being evident in the cosmos, the sun and moon ruling over the lesser lights. That hierarchical order was to be replicated on earth.
My point in noting the origins of these ideas is that if they are based on primitive misunderstanding of the nature of reality and life, then we are freed to find entirely new and more humane ways of understanding and defining the spiritual.
And most liberating- if there never was a separation of humanity from God, then there is no need for salvation and all the guilt, anxiety and fear that has burdened humanity in relation to salvation mythology.
But yes to your point that we have developed as something uniquely different from animal life. Consciousness is taking us in an entirely new and more humane direction. And that is the manifestation of transcendence in the universe. It is the ladder of progress that science recognizes more as integral to life. Just out of interest, see article in latest Atlantic Monthly 'ET and God' for update on scientific attitudes about this thing of design versus randomness.