I read your last post carefully, Aladdin, and sympathise with your questioning, but at least you are questioining and not just accepting blindly.
I see the problem as being related to Monotheism in general.
When this is related to ancient texts that were written by human beings for other people alive at the time... in other words, within their context then, whether it was in the Middle East or wherever, and then I view what happened to those writings through multiple translations and interpretations and all that implies, and I observe that an edifice of morality and ethics has been built by others upon those writings, and those writings have been turned into dogma and doctrines... I begin, justifiably, I think, to worry.
The very act of turning spiritual responses into regulated forms through artificial conceptions like 'Churches' and a defined monotheistic religion... makes me worry too.
I am not denying that people shouldn't come together for fellowship, related by similar minded spiritual concepts, but I am saying that they should never then promote their responses to doctrinal dogma that suggests they, and they only, are heirs to a 'revealed truth' that is some kind of 'ultimate' truth. That immediately denigrates other peoples different spiritual responses to 'second rate', and that does not seem justifiable to me.
Everyone's spiritual responses are worthwhile, even if we think they are crazier than our own!