c0de
Vassal
- Messages
- 2,237
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
I have just been accused of plagiarism by Resigned.
After this person could post no rebuttal to my initial post on
the Proof of God thread, he proceeded to accuse me of allegedly
copy/pasting someone else's words. He actually used this as a
justification for not even attempting to deal with my argument.
So what I ask is this: This person provide proof that I copy pasted
my post from someone else. If he can not provide this proof, then
he has falsely accused someone of a serious crime. (I dont know if
it is legally a crime, but it should be!)
The reason I am making a big deal of this is because such an action destroys
the entire foundation for a civil discourse. If you to avoid the other person's
entire argument and falsely accuse the person of plagiarism, you get away
with destroying the entire dialogue of the entire thread.
After this person could post no rebuttal to my initial post on
the Proof of God thread, he proceeded to accuse me of allegedly
copy/pasting someone else's words. He actually used this as a
justification for not even attempting to deal with my argument.
So what I ask is this: This person provide proof that I copy pasted
my post from someone else. If he can not provide this proof, then
he has falsely accused someone of a serious crime. (I dont know if
it is legally a crime, but it should be!)
The reason I am making a big deal of this is because such an action destroys
the entire foundation for a civil discourse. If you to avoid the other person's
entire argument and falsely accuse the person of plagiarism, you get away
with destroying the entire dialogue of the entire thread.