Hey Frosty ... sorry, overlooked this in all the chatter ...
So let's work it out in a hypothetical situation.
OK.
Pretext: God is all-knowing, and God is all-powerful.
OK.
God sees that 3 days into the future, on Wednesday June 18th, Thomas will be climbing the steps at the library, and a huge flock of crazed birds will fly above him and defecate all over him. He will be covered head to toe in bird feces, and everyone will point at him and laugh. The event will be so utterly humiliating, that Thomas will be eventually forced to leave town and take up roots elsewhere.
Have you been talking to my wife?
God has the power to prevent this from happening. Obviously.
Obviously.
On Wednesday, June 18th, Thomas is climbing up the steps of the local library and the birds do their thing, and everything happens exactly as God foresaw that it would.
Yes.
Ok. My claim is that since God knew it was going to happen, and had the power to stop it; the fact that it happened anyway means that God chose not to intercede, which also means that God permitted it to happen.
Yes.
Please demonstrate where my claim is false.
I would argue that preknowledge does not prove predestination.
For me, the message of the Gospels is not that Christ is there to preserve and protect us against the tragic in the everyday, rather that He is there with us, and stands in solidarity with us, when they do.
It's a question of theodicy: If God is good, why does shit happen?
I do not believe, as many Christians do (and the vast majority, if my experience is anything to go by), that suffering is caused or allowed by God because to embrace it leads us towards perfection.
Theodicy is something I respond to by instinct rather than any insight.
I do not hold, as many philosophers do, that this world is necessarily 'the best of all possible worlds', nor that it is intrinsically bad. It's just a world governed by the finite and the contingent, the random and the accidental.
Shit happens for no good nor bad end, it just happens. That's the nature of the cosmos in which we live.
The sheer weight of suffering experienced by the world is excessive. Long drawn-out debilities, terminal illnesses, Alzheimer's disease, the suffering of children. It's too blunt, too brutal a tool to be deployed by any kind of Deity who speaks of love or compassion. I reject karma on the same principle. Likewise I reject the philosophies of gnosticism.
Nor do these instances of suffering serve any useful purpose, as they cannot lead to the moral development of the sufferer. (I reject the common idea of hell for the same reason.)
If our lives are indeed so micro-managed, then where is our freedom to act? We are not free at all, and then we are punished by a God who determines what we're going to do ... which makes God 'conflicted', to say the least, if not outright cruel and capricious.
It is in that very moment, indeed in our every moment in act of being, that we are faced with the freedom to make choices, the chance to make the world a better place.