Mus Zibii
QUID EST VERITAS
- Messages
- 469
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I'm by no means a scholar, and I'll readily admit that this notion is based on amateur speculation. So take pity on me.
Anyway, with the popularity of Mel Gibson's crap movie 'The Passion' I've started hearing one time anglo-obsessed Christians referring to Jesus as Yeshua. I can't help but wonder why this name wasn't transliterated into Greek or Latin as Joshua as opposed to Jesus.
In the Talmud and Jewish traditions of Jesus his name was 'parodied' with the acronym Yimach Shemo Uzzikhrono (Talmud has a lot of obscure humor once its pointed out, like a New Yorker cartoon). Romanizing Yeshu would likely include the adding of the arbitrary (I'm sure there's a reason for it) additional S.
It doesn't seem natural that the romantic Greek rendering of the semitic name would result in Jesus. So I wondered if the adopted (yeah, I know its from the fourth century, not an air-tight theory, never said it was) Yimach Shemo Uzzikhrono might've been mistaken by gentiles as a name rather than a rude title.
Anyway, with the popularity of Mel Gibson's crap movie 'The Passion' I've started hearing one time anglo-obsessed Christians referring to Jesus as Yeshua. I can't help but wonder why this name wasn't transliterated into Greek or Latin as Joshua as opposed to Jesus.
In the Talmud and Jewish traditions of Jesus his name was 'parodied' with the acronym Yimach Shemo Uzzikhrono (Talmud has a lot of obscure humor once its pointed out, like a New Yorker cartoon). Romanizing Yeshu would likely include the adding of the arbitrary (I'm sure there's a reason for it) additional S.
It doesn't seem natural that the romantic Greek rendering of the semitic name would result in Jesus. So I wondered if the adopted (yeah, I know its from the fourth century, not an air-tight theory, never said it was) Yimach Shemo Uzzikhrono might've been mistaken by gentiles as a name rather than a rude title.