turner_chris1
turner_chris1
Just to start - do we all agree that -
1) Islam was essentially unknown in South America/Mexico between 650 AD and say the 1500's when the Spanish/Portuguese brought African slaves over, and even then, they were forced to become Catholic christians.
2) That the religons of the Inca and Aztecs and other civilisations in South America were not based on the Koran. (perhaps there is a line in the Koran about tearing the heart from the beating body with a sharp stone and kicking the body down the pyramid to be eaten by the warriors of your tribe whcih I havent noticed .)
3) That the following verses from the Koran are a reasonably accurate translation of the arabic
35.24 Surely We have sent you with the truth as a bearer of good news and a warner; and there is not a people but a warner has gone among them.
[35.25] And if they call you a liar, so did those before them indeed call (their apostles) liars; their apostles had come to them with clear arguments, and with scriptures, and with the illuminating book.
So why, if every people has been sent a warner, with clear arguments and illumunating books, were the South Americans sent a rubbish one, a not convincing one, one they don't seem to have believed or trusted?
Why did the Arabs get the best one ever, but the Aztecs only got a grade three reject?
Why didn't the Aztecs and Inca need to know anything about the Koran - themost important book ever written - for over a thousand years?
Why didn't Allah love the Astecs and Inca* like he loved the Arabs?
(*Or the ancient British, Irish, Russians, Chinese, Australians, Sioux, Cherochee, Inuits, Vikings, Indians, Ceylonese, Burmese, Hottentot, Pigmy, Tibetens...............)
1) Islam was essentially unknown in South America/Mexico between 650 AD and say the 1500's when the Spanish/Portuguese brought African slaves over, and even then, they were forced to become Catholic christians.
2) That the religons of the Inca and Aztecs and other civilisations in South America were not based on the Koran. (perhaps there is a line in the Koran about tearing the heart from the beating body with a sharp stone and kicking the body down the pyramid to be eaten by the warriors of your tribe whcih I havent noticed .)
3) That the following verses from the Koran are a reasonably accurate translation of the arabic
35.24 Surely We have sent you with the truth as a bearer of good news and a warner; and there is not a people but a warner has gone among them.
[35.25] And if they call you a liar, so did those before them indeed call (their apostles) liars; their apostles had come to them with clear arguments, and with scriptures, and with the illuminating book.
So why, if every people has been sent a warner, with clear arguments and illumunating books, were the South Americans sent a rubbish one, a not convincing one, one they don't seem to have believed or trusted?
Why did the Arabs get the best one ever, but the Aztecs only got a grade three reject?
Why didn't the Aztecs and Inca need to know anything about the Koran - themost important book ever written - for over a thousand years?
Why didn't Allah love the Astecs and Inca* like he loved the Arabs?
(*Or the ancient British, Irish, Russians, Chinese, Australians, Sioux, Cherochee, Inuits, Vikings, Indians, Ceylonese, Burmese, Hottentot, Pigmy, Tibetens...............)