islam, abraham?

Oh, and I am one of those Christians... I don't believe G!d "told" anyone to kill anyone, I believe those passages are either metaphor or man blaming G!d for their actions.
 
Wil I am sure many things in the Old Testament need to be read in context and were time appropriate, same with the Quran and if Christians wish to bin the Old Testament that's up to them, yay for peace. My example was only to show that people pick and choose which parts of scripture they want to follow and to truly follow a scripture I think we need to study and work out which parts were metaphor, what was the context, time appropriate action, etc or we are not understanding scripture, we are just choosing the parts we like.

Another example would be from Judaism. I'm so sick of hearing people say Jews can have sex with a girl who is 3 years and 1 day old, this is about marriage contracts, not pedophilia and that would have been appropriate at the time when girls were entered into marriage contracts, all over the world, at very early ages to protect tribal and land ties. People can't simply choose to ignore that part of the Talmud, they just need to understand it correctly.
 
Oh, and I am one of those Christians... I don't believe G!d "told" anyone to kill anyone, I believe those passages are either metaphor or man blaming G!d for their actions.
IMO, There is lots of "If someone does [ACTION], kill them" that was meant quite literally in the OT. God had a reason, of course we could discuss the legitimacy of such, but either way it doesn't change the fact that the OT is rampant with issues to be dealt with using death. I was never one of the Abrogationists when I studies the Bible, so I took to it as the Law is there, and Jesus' (PBUH) Message was that it is more righteous (or further the only righteous choice) to forgive people of these sins, and let God decide what to do with them later. I also figured that forgiveness of these crimes doesn't mean no punishment, but rather less punishment (instead of death, do lashes or jail time). This is mostly how I read the Bible now still. I've tried discussing this with Christian friends, but most seem stuck in the "Jesus saved us by being crucified and killed on the cross" and "judge not..." as a reason not to claim someone guilty. To which I find a major flaw in accountability. That is my Opinion anyway.
 
I'm talking about God did to go kill all those people (genocide) and then asks...did you kill them all? No go back and kill all the women and children and old people too...kill them all but save the virgins for yourself.... I don't buy that as literal...

That would be man mking gos in his image
..
 
Well to be fair in Islam we are told to make 70 excuses for our brother, is that also a major flaw in accountability?

To be honest this is an issue the Muslim world really needs to look at IMO ... why so many choose to take the most severe path. An example, women are still being stoned for adultery but how many of them do you think we're having zina in a public place (in order to have 4 reliable male witnesses see the genitals join together)? How many do you think confessed three times without retracting their confession (many of course go to the police to report they have been raped and are then charged with adultery because they 'confessed to zina'). Some are charged with adultery because they fall pregnant outside marriage but how many of those girls were raped and scared to report it in cast they were seen as having confessed to zina???

Where is our desire to make 70 excuses for our brother? That is not to say we should not follow shariah but we should at least get our house in order first.
 
The simple answer is because Islam teaches that we must believe in the Prophets (pbut) and books (Torah and Bible) which came before (in their true form). In Islam Jews and Christians are called People of the Book.

Muslims must believe in all the Prophets from Adam to Mohamed, the Final Prophet, (pbut). This includes Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham - pbuh) and the Quran contains a chapter called Ibrahim, as he is the father of both the Jews and Arabs through his sons.

We believe that Isa (Jesus - pbuh) was sent by G-d to correct the wrongdoings of the Jews (in not following their given faith correctly, hence stories like Jesus fighting with money lenders in the temple and the golden calf). Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) was then sent to correct the wrongdoings of Christians in creating the trinity and placing partners with G-d but the religions, when they were each revealed, were one and the same.

All three religions come from the same source, G-d, and all three state there is only One G-d.

................................

How strange it is the second time I have met up with this piece of video trash today so I shall just copy and post my answer again.

The start of the video sets a scene of how all religions, other than Islam, are peaceful and the Torah/Bible is full of peace and quaint stories not to be taken literally ... it's effective propaganda but total rubbish of course:

Ezekiel 9:6 "Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children, and women . . . "

Isaiah 13:16 "Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished."

Deuteronomy 13:15 "Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly . . . "


The video deals with 3 topics, all of which are factually incorrect:

1. Abrogated passages - There are 2 issues with this. First, yes later passages of the Quran abrogate newer passages but even the best Islamic scholars can only use their judgement as to when each passage was written, this absolute knowledge (of when each passage was written) was lost centuries ago. Secondly the video suggests that violent passages abrogate peaceful ones ... which violent passages are they speaking of? Usually it is the "sword verses" and every Muslim knows those verses are speaking about a particular set of events which happened in the time of the Prophet, about a particular enemy tribe and are simply used by jihadists to cause violence and by anti Muslims to say how bad Islam is.

2. Worldwide Sharia law - this threat is always used to scare people. All Muslims know that there will be worldwide Sharia law but this will happen when the Messiah returns to earth and wages war against sin. People cannot perform the work of the Messiah and as he hasn't returned yet it means there can't be worldwide Sharia law.

Also the Sharia court in the UK is allowed to rule on matters such as inheritance and divorce. There have been Jewish courts in the UK for decades but I haven't seen you posting video's about that.

3. Taqiyya (lying) is forbidden in Islam, other than in 3 circumstances.

Humaid b. 'Abd al-Rahman b. 'Auf reported that his mother Umm Kulthum daughter of 'Uqba b. Abu Mu'ait, and she was one amongst the first emigrants who pledged allegiance to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him), as saying that she heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good. Ibn Shihab said he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).

There is nothing that allows a Muslim to lie about what the Quran says to make people convert or show Islam in a good light to non Muslims.

If you scroll down on the info bit under the video it gives all the sources it used.

Info about abrogation in the Quran comes from the Methodist Publishing House and a website called Muhammadanism.org ... which they themselves state is very anti-Islam.

Info on Sharia comes from Wafa Sultan, who is a proven liar and she isn't even a Sunni Muslim (the vast majority of Muslims) but Shia, who follow some very strange practices and religious laws not accepted in Sunni Islam. She went to America and became very rich and famous for slagging off Islam after telling a lot of lies about her life back home - she went from welfare in America to a mansion based on these stories so not a very reliable source.

The original video was posted on a blog which claims "Islam is of the devil" ... so no axe to grind there then lol.

A lot of their info originates on a website called Crusader's Armory ... which just about says all we need to know about this video.
salaam sis

i was reading your post and one thing caught my eye; you have converted for a long time now right?, but why do you keep on righting the word 'God' like the Jews with - in the middle of g and d?; they do it as they say we dont know Gods real name ... but muslims know Gods real name so rather interesting to me why you still do that???; could it be that you have not been able to renounce judaism beliefs that go against Islam in your heart? if so then this is very serious sis; your learning and views of Islam will be compromised with your former religion and also you will be a hypocrite to Allah :eek:
 
Well to be fair in Islam we are told to make 70 excuses for our brother, is that also a major flaw in accountability?

To be honest this is an issue the Muslim world really needs to look at IMO ... why so many choose to take the most severe path. An example, women are still being stoned for adultery but how many of them do you think we're having zina in a public place (in order to have 4 reliable male witnesses see the genitals join together)? How many do you think confessed three times without retracting their confession (many of course go to the police to report they have been raped and are then charged with adultery because they 'confessed to zina'). Some are charged with adultery because they fall pregnant outside marriage but how many of those girls were raped and scared to report it in cast they were seen as having confessed to zina???

Where is our desire to make 70 excuses for our brother? That is not to say we should not follow shariah but we should at least get our house in order first.
pregnancy when their husband is away [and he couldn't have been the one ... ] is also another form of proof; some muslim women do want to go to heaven by confessing and getting the punishment as a form of purging of their sins.
 
The simple answer is because Islam teaches that we must believe in the Prophets (pbut) and books (Torah and Bible) which came before (in their true form). In Islam Jews and Christians are called People of the Book.

Muslims must believe in all the Prophets from Adam to Mohamed, the Final Prophet, (pbut). This includes Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham - pbuh) and the Quran contains a chapter called Ibrahim, as he is the father of both the Jews and Arabs through his sons.

We believe that Isa (Jesus - pbuh) was sent by G-d to correct the wrongdoings of the Jews (in not following their given faith correctly, hence stories like Jesus fighting with money lenders in the temple and the golden calf). Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) was then sent to correct the wrongdoings of Christians in creating the trinity and placing partners with G-d but the religions, when they were each revealed, were one and the same.

All three religions come from the same source, G-d, and all three state there is only One G-d.

................................

How strange it is the second time I have met up with this piece of video trash today so I shall just copy and post my answer again.

The start of the video sets a scene of how all religions, other than Islam, are peaceful and the Torah/Bible is full of peace and quaint stories not to be taken literally ... it's effective propaganda but total rubbish of course:

Ezekiel 9:6 "Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children, and women . . . "

Isaiah 13:16 "Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished."

Deuteronomy 13:15 "Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly . . . "


The video deals with 3 topics, all of which are factually incorrect:

1. Abrogated passages - There are 2 issues with this. First, yes later passages of the Quran abrogate newer passages but even the best Islamic scholars can only use their judgement as to when each passage was written, this absolute knowledge (of when each passage was written) was lost centuries ago. Secondly the video suggests that violent passages abrogate peaceful ones ... which violent passages are they speaking of? Usually it is the "sword verses" and every Muslim knows those verses are speaking about a particular set of events which happened in the time of the Prophet, about a particular enemy tribe and are simply used by jihadists to cause violence and by anti Muslims to say how bad Islam is.

2. Worldwide Sharia law - this threat is always used to scare people. All Muslims know that there will be worldwide Sharia law but this will happen when the Messiah returns to earth and wages war against sin. People cannot perform the work of the Messiah and as he hasn't returned yet it means there can't be worldwide Sharia law.

Also the Sharia court in the UK is allowed to rule on matters such as inheritance and divorce. There have been Jewish courts in the UK for decades but I haven't seen you posting video's about that.

3. Taqiyya (lying) is forbidden in Islam, other than in 3 circumstances.

Humaid b. 'Abd al-Rahman b. 'Auf reported that his mother Umm Kulthum daughter of 'Uqba b. Abu Mu'ait, and she was one amongst the first emigrants who pledged allegiance to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him), as saying that she heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good. Ibn Shihab said he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).

There is nothing that allows a Muslim to lie about what the Quran says to make people convert or show Islam in a good light to non Muslims.

If you scroll down on the info bit under the video it gives all the sources it used.

Info about abrogation in the Quran comes from the Methodist Publishing House and a website called Muhammadanism.org ... which they themselves state is very anti-Islam.

Info on Sharia comes from Wafa Sultan, who is a proven liar and she isn't even a Sunni Muslim (the vast majority of Muslims) but Shia, who follow some very strange practices and religious laws not accepted in Sunni Islam. She went to America and became very rich and famous for slagging off Islam after telling a lot of lies about her life back home - she went from welfare in America to a mansion based on these stories so not a very reliable source.

The original video was posted on a blog which claims "Islam is of the devil" ... so no axe to grind there then lol.

A lot of their info originates on a website called Crusader's Armory ... which just about says all we need to know about this video.
taqiyyah in the way the non-muslims associate it to Islam is only done by the shias and shias are a tiny astray minority amongst muslims but ofcourse when the anti-Islams write about it, it is convenient for them to make out all muslims use it that way!
 
I'm talking about God did to go kill all those people (genocide) and then asks...did you kill them all? No go back and kill all the women and children and old people too...kill them all but save the virgins for yourself.... I don't buy that as literal...

That would be man mking gos in his image
..
I think that is an example of fabrication, not non-literal speech. IMO of course.
 
Well to be fair in Islam we are told to make 70 excuses for our brother, is that also a major flaw in accountability?

To be honest this is an issue the Muslim world really needs to look at IMO ... why so many choose to take the most severe path. An example, women are still being stoned for adultery but how many of them do you think we're having zina in a public place (in order to have 4 reliable male witnesses see the genitals join together)? How many do you think confessed three times without retracting their confession (many of course go to the police to report they have been raped and are then charged with adultery because they 'confessed to zina'). Some are charged with adultery because they fall pregnant outside marriage but how many of those girls were raped and scared to report it in cast they were seen as having confessed to zina???

Where is our desire to make 70 excuses for our brother? That is not to say we should not follow shariah but we should at least get our house in order first.
There is a major issue with people taking our words too literal and then warping them to fit a wierd desire such as protecting a man from being called a rapist by claiming the woman was an adulterer or fornicator.

btw, 70 excuses for our brother comes from a Hadith if i'm not mistaken. I've so many comments to make about such a broad statement that both support and deny it. In short I'd say it holds accountability if it is followed through. Use your example... but the man's side (Just for sake of argument)

He raped her...
1) Are you sure she is telling the truth that intercourse was enacted on her?... (assume yes is answered)
2) Is she maybe mistaken?... (no)
3) Is it even possible for him to be there?... (yes)
...
40) was his act intentional, or did he mistake her for his wife playing the I like it rough game? (intentional..)
Lashes, Jail, stoning, etc whatever is legal... If any of the above say he didn't do it intentionally... maybe you lighten the sentence to something easier (Jail time)... this is all assuming you had the proper number of witnesses in the first place, even her confession (assuming she confessed to doing zina outright) is only 1 witness, is 1 way of looking at it...
 
salaam sis

i was reading your post and one thing caught my eye; you have converted for a long time now right?, but why do you keep on righting the word 'God' like the Jews with - in the middle of g and d?; they do it as they say we dont know Gods real name ... but muslims know Gods real name so rather interesting to me why you still do that???; could it be that you have not been able to renounce judaism beliefs that go against Islam in your heart? if so then this is very serious sis; your learning and views of Islam will be compromised with your former religion and also you will be a hypocrite to Allah :eek:
or is it possible that since wil normally does this she is respecting his views by writing it in the same way? g-d is safer that God IMO, due to it being known which God we are referring to and not just a god such as the polytheists have?
 
could it be that you have not been able to renounce judaism beliefs that go against Islam in your heart? if so then this is very serious sis; your learning and views of Islam will be compromised with your former religion and also you will be a hypocrite to Allah :eek:
Over analysing much? Can we keep to the issues and leave the person out of it?
 
Over analysing much? Can we keep to the issues and leave the person out of it?
yeah but i was a bit upset to see that; i know muslim woman from before; she had some very hypocrytical views in past and thought she might have changed as her knowledge grew and seeing that brought back all the old memories! :(
 
She has been the best explainer of Islam to non Muslims on this board. Without animosity or sarcasm or getting defensive she has repeatedly taken tough questions and provided an understanding to others chapter and verse....

If you think her hypocritical.... I find it interesting you are so quiet on others who post on behalf of your belief system.
 
could it be that you have not been able to renounce judaism beliefs that go against Islam in your heart? if so then this is very serious sis; your learning and views of Islam will be compromised with your former religion and also you will be a hypocrite to Allah :eek:

Wa alaikum Salam

You make many assumptions. I was never a Jew. I use G-d because this is an interfaith forum and I try to respect others beliefs as well as my own.
 
There is a major issue with people taking our words too literal and then warping them to fit a wierd desire such as protecting a man from being called a rapist by claiming the woman was an adulterer or fornicator.

70 excuses comes from Hamdun al-Qassar, narrated by Imam Bayhaqi in his Shu`ab al-Iman

“"If a friend among your friends errs, make seventy excuses for them. If your hearts are unable to do this, then know that the shortcoming is in your own selves…".

We know from the Prophet (pbuh) he would try not to punish people unless it was unavoidable Take the example of the woman who came to him to confess to zina, he sent her away twice to rethink and only on the third confession did he order her punishment. Also examples like some Shafi'i jurists who said that pregnancy of a divorced woman is not proof of zina, As the Quran and Hadith do not state pregnancy as evidence of zina and a pregnancy can last 4-7 years.

Now compare that to the number of women in certain countries who are waiting for their death sentence for zina but who actually victims of rape. Of course some will have zinc and then claim rape when they find they are pregnant. But the point I was trying to make is so many now just want to go for the most severe interpretations, instead of looking for reasons to lessen the charges or punishment.

Not sure if that makes more sense or not, I've had some very troubling news today so my brain isn't fully switched on.
 
Back
Top