Firstly, what do you mean when you use the word recycling?
Recycling energy. Perpetual motion. If the situation were different, the nature of things here would be dramatically different.
If you know anything about the Theory of Gaia you will know that the earth is a self sustaining planetary organism that operates as a whole. Also, I am a firm believer in the laws of thermodynamics, and due to the actions of entropy is not the heat passed on from one thing to another continuously. The Sun to the earth and from being to matter, and matter to being on earth.
You appear to have missed an understanding of the thermodynamic laws. The cycles you see on Earth are not self sustaining, but rely on the sun as a source of energy. The energy source of the sun is finite and it has an end. By the laws of thermodynamics there will be a time that this planet does not spin, does not orbit, and does not exist together as a planet.
The point I am making is that there is no true or false, right or wrong, up or down, or any other label we wish to use, other than the nominal use that it was created for. The universe is empty of having such qualities, except from the perspective of the one perceiving it.
Yes, and I said this is false. Your computer demonstrates with logic gates how there is a physical capability to compare and amplify, which requires energy and produces information based on the comparison. For example, "True those two were the same", "False those were different", "True one of those were True". The signals are represented as voltages, but it is the ability to compare and amplify signals that permits the logic gate. These flows of information exist in nature too: duplicating, comparing, amplifying, and distributing information. "True this gene has a chance", "False this gene will destroy the whole organism". The concept of right or wrong could be thought of as noise, or a dishonest comparator that passes random signals off rather than providing an honest comparison. So while these terms may be human representations of physical things, the physical qualities are an organization of matter that cause comparison and amplification, and are found to exist. The human part comes in finding ways to organise and make use of those comparators.
There is only the universe operating according to its own nature, and however intelligent we might be we are still made up from bits of the universe. All things and processes are connected because they are all one. If then there are no values other than the subjective ones we create, then all things are equal.
Also not true. The connectivity between things has a lot to do with the organization of the matter between them, and distance. From a study of control systems, a time lag destroys the ability to employ a control system. Things that are distant are less connected than things that are close by. For example there is very little way for something 1 light year away to have any control here, because it will take a year for it to measure, and a year to respond. That time lag destroys the ability to employ a feedback system to provide control. The connectivity of two things 1 meter apart is greater than the connectivity of two things 1 light year apart. Thus in terms of interaction, communication, or control, things are not equal.
There are no sides to take, or battles to fight or arguments to have other than the ones we create for ourselves. This is Emptiness, which is the basis of my original comment.
I find that arguments are not necessarily a total fabrication, and do have roots.
These are however only my opinions and beliefs, which are empty in themselves, but according to years of Buddhist logic and reasoning they are as constant and evident as the scientific knowledge that the universe is getting colder and that eventually there will be no matter, and therefore no universe, no space or time.
One way of removing the emptiness from an opinion, a belief, a theory, or a hypothesis, is to go obtain the experience. If logic is based on measurement, then the logic may be valid, but merely hearing it or reading it does not reproduce the experience. I believe a lack of experience is the emptiness you are referring to. Given the internet and media revolution, I do think the emptiness is becoming greater in people. In some ways I am providing you empty words, because you may not yet have experience to verify or refute what I say.
