First, I (as a trinitarian christian...okay a little agnostic, cannot help that) do not accept Jesus as Michael. Yeshoshua (or Joshua) was probably a believing Jew who did not really think he was founding a religion (IMHO). We owe the traditional notion of Jesus to the destruction of his Jewish followers in the 70 and 130 uprisings, the teachings of Saul-Paul, and the misunderstanding of the Greeks vis a vis G!d.
Now I understand that the above statement may seem a little inconsistent ("trinitarian" in the same paragraph as the remainder). But I beleive in the Christ who was not born and the Pentacost that has never ended (think mythically or mstically, not literally).
Panta Rhei! (Everything Flows!)
he was a revolutionary (and in some ways heretical) reforming rabbi 2,000 years ago who got too popular and consequently fell foul of the machinery of roman state security.
this "archangel michael" stuff is bollocks. if you keep going on about it i'm going to remove the posts. go and be mad somewhere else.
b'shalom
bananabrain
Freedom of speech guarenteed under the constituation. Seems you dont care about that. Only your views.he was a revolutionary (and in some ways heretical) reforming rabbi 2,000 years ago who got too popular and consequently fell foul of the machinery of roman state security.
this "archangel michael" stuff is bollocks. if you keep going on about it i'm going to remove the posts. go and be mad somewhere else.
b'shalom
bananabrain
he was a revolutionary (and in some ways heretical) reforming rabbi 2,000 years ago who got too popular and consequently fell foul of the machinery of roman state security.
this "archangel michael" stuff is bollocks. if you keep going on about it i'm going to remove the posts. go and be mad somewhere else.
b'shalom
bananabrain
Freedom of speech guarenteed under the constitution. Seems you dont care about that. Only your views.