Who do the jews say Jesus is?

Status
Not open for further replies.

donnann

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
2
Points
36
I know JESUS is Michael but who do JEWS the majority think he is?
 
First, I (as a trinitarian christian...okay a little agnostic, cannot help that) do not accept Jesus as Michael. Yeshoshua (or Joshua) was probably a believing Jew who did not really think he was founding a religion (IMHO). We owe the traditional notion of Jesus to the destruction of his Jewish followers in the 70 and 130 uprisings, the teachings of Saul-Paul, and the misunderstanding of the Greeks vis a vis G!d.

Now I understand that the above statement may seem a little inconsistent ("trinitarian" in the same paragraph as the remainder). But I beleive in the Christ who was not born and the Pentacost that has never ended (think mythically or mstically, not literally).

Panta Rhei! (Everything Flows!)
 
First, I (as a trinitarian christian...okay a little agnostic, cannot help that) do not accept Jesus as Michael. Yeshoshua (or Joshua) was probably a believing Jew who did not really think he was founding a religion (IMHO). We owe the traditional notion of Jesus to the destruction of his Jewish followers in the 70 and 130 uprisings, the teachings of Saul-Paul, and the misunderstanding of the Greeks vis a vis G!d.

Now I understand that the above statement may seem a little inconsistent ("trinitarian" in the same paragraph as the remainder). But I beleive in the Christ who was not born and the Pentacost that has never ended (think mythically or mstically, not literally).

Panta Rhei! (Everything Flows!)

I know for sure the man they called JESUS back in Israel really is MICHAEL the ARCHANGEL I was just wondering who the jews think he is as a majority.
 
he was a revolutionary (and in some ways heretical) reforming rabbi 2,000 years ago who got too popular and consequently fell foul of the machinery of roman state security.

this "archangel michael" stuff is bollocks. if you keep going on about it i'm going to remove the posts. go and be mad somewhere else.

b'shalom

bananabrain
 
he was a revolutionary (and in some ways heretical) reforming rabbi 2,000 years ago who got too popular and consequently fell foul of the machinery of roman state security.

this "archangel michael" stuff is bollocks. if you keep going on about it i'm going to remove the posts. go and be mad somewhere else.

b'shalom

bananabrain

I am not mad you are. See I dont believe the jews are responsable for crucifying him.
 
he was a revolutionary (and in some ways heretical) reforming rabbi 2,000 years ago who got too popular and consequently fell foul of the machinery of roman state security.

this "archangel michael" stuff is bollocks. if you keep going on about it i'm going to remove the posts. go and be mad somewhere else.

b'shalom

bananabrain
Freedom of speech guarenteed under the constituation. Seems you dont care about that. Only your views.
 
he was a revolutionary (and in some ways heretical) reforming rabbi 2,000 years ago who got too popular and consequently fell foul of the machinery of roman state security.

this "archangel michael" stuff is bollocks. if you keep going on about it i'm going to remove the posts. go and be mad somewhere else.

b'shalom

bananabrain


By the way Shabbot Shalom
 
Freedom of speech guarenteed under the constitution. Seems you dont care about that. Only your views.

this is a website hosted in britain and has nothing to do with the US constitution. interfaith.org is privately owned and is not obliged to provide people like you with a platform to spout ill-digested claptrap. we have a code of conduct which is enforced by the moderators such as myself. i suggest you take a hint - thread closed.

btw, "shabbat shalom" is not normally something you say on a wednesday.

b'shalom

bananabrain
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top