The Great Mother Archetype

Etu Malku

Mercuræn
Messages
1,439
Reaction score
2
Points
38
I was asked to go into this theory a little more, so here I am ;)

The Collective Unconscious has roots in the deep ancestral past of the entire species. These include distant ancestor’s experiences with universal concepts like God, mother, water, earth, that are transmitted through the generations so that people in every time have been influenced by their primate ancestor’s primordial experiences.

The contents of the collective unconscious are the same (more or less) for people of every culture! These influence may peoples myths, legends, and religions. It is human’s innate tendency to react in a particular way whenever their experiences stimulate a biologically inherited response tendency (like a mother’s unlearned or unlikely response of love toward her newborn).

Initially contact with these images are forms without content but with practice the content emerges and become relatively autonomous images called archetypes.

Anima is the feminine side of men and originates in the collective unconscious as an archetype and remains extremely resistant to consciousness.

To master the projection of the anima, men must overcome intellectual barriers, delve into the far recesses of their unconscious, and realize the feminine side of their personality.

Jung believed that the anima originated from early men’s experiences with women including mothers, sisters, and lovers which combine into the concept of women.

Animus is the masculine side of women and originates in the collective unconscious as an archetype that, too, is resistant to consciousness.

Animus originates from early women’s experiences with men including fathers, brothers, and lovers that are combined into the concept of men.
Both the anima and animus can influence the relationship of men and women with partners. The animus appears in dreams, visions, and fantasies in a personified form.

The Great Mother Archetype is a derivative of the animus and anima.
Every man and women possess a great mother archetype. The pre-existing concept of mother has both positive and negative feeling which extends to this archetype.

The Great Mother represents the opposing forces of fertility and nourishment on the one hand and power and destruction on the other. t is also known as godmother, Mother of God, Mother Nature, Mother Earth, the stepmother, and even a Witch.

Fertility and power combine to form the concept of rebirth and is represented in the process of reincarnation, baptism, resurrection, and individuation.
 
Thanks. Most of the Jungian individuation stuff I find deals mostly with men and anima. I've only found a few blurbs about women and their individuation.
 
1] Did you know that the word "Anima" in Latin is "soul"?

2] Have you yet heard of Caroline Myss (pron 'Mace').

She is an intuitve healer ---as far as I know she doesn't puport to cure an illness but rather where the illness is connected to a person via analysis of a persons Archetype & the chakra wjhence the 'Type of illness' is rooted.

She wrote:
"Why People Don't Heal and How They Can"
and
"Anatomy of the Spirit"
 
1] Did you know that the word "Anima" in Latin is "soul"?

2] Have you yet heard of Caroline Myss (pron 'Mace').

She is an intuitve healer ---as far as I know she doesn't puport to cure an illness but rather where the illness is connected to a person via analysis of a persons Archetype & the chakra wjhence the 'Type of illness' is rooted.

She wrote:
"Why People Don't Heal and How They Can"
and
"Anatomy of the Spirit"
Interesting bhaktajan, I didn't know that in Latin it is soul . . .

Androgyny is from Greek andmeans “Andro” / male; “gyn” / female.
 
Well, the androgen is the one that prompts me with the question, "What do you want to do?" in the few times I've heard it while in crisis.
 
Androgynous archetype or what is continuable (knowing not subject to change, but can be added to and worded according to activity places) about androgyny is referring to the way life is positioned together when an existence is whole. The positioning is according to process places (life of sight, life of orientation, life of doing and saying all together being one area entity). While an existence (human and non human) may understand itself now as male or female, they may not when their existence is united doing what it can always do and continue to do while understanding with an aware unity of consciousness that moves them according to the experience of interest.

Whether you are moved during what is repositioning to a different orientation pertaining to what is gender or if your orientation remains that same, you will know yourself this way and it will be perfectly understood.
Please don't start this on my thread . . . none of that made any sense (unless someone can translate it for me?)
 
That actually makes quite a bit of sense, as I experienced it while in my dissociative shock experience during childbirth when my awareness was scattered all about--both in and out of my body in multiple places.

Thanks, Allelyah. :)
 
With the words Aware United Consciousness you may be able to use yourself to understand it. If you want to use the word "Collective Aware Consciousness" this is okay to start. This would be the transformed collective unconscious. To understand knowing about it, it may initially require you to go over to some place that you love to be in to understand it completely.

What people like Jung and others have understood (given inspiration around, given wisdom, images and words), you can use yourself to participate in. That is knowledge and it is available to all according to your interests. What Jung understood did not end and intereting content never does.
I'm sorry, perhaps because I am American I can't comprehend any of this, I'll break it down for all of you:

With the words Aware United Consciousness you may be able to use yourself to understand it.
the phrase "Aware United Consciousness" has been used as a title, it no longer functions as the adjective for "with the words". Beyond that the phrase makes no sense to anything I am talking about or even what I know.

Next: "If you want to use the word "Collective Aware Consciousness" this is okay to start." - I have never used this phrase, so no, I don't want to use this phrase . . . plus it is a phrase not a 'word' as you have stated.

Next: "To understand knowing about it, it may initially require you to go over to some place that you love to be in to understand it completely." - This sentence makes no sense at all, children form more coherent sentences than this.


Furthermore, the entirety of your commentary makes no sense, addresses nothing I am talking about, and like all the other threads you have participated in, has derailed the notion, idea, topic of the thread into some moronic rambling of incoherency.

I am going to ask for you to be banned from here, as I feel you are not conducive to intelligent conversation. I am sorry.
 
I'm sorry, perhaps because I am American I can't comprehend any of this, I'll break it down for all of you:

the phrase "Aware United Consciousness" has been used as a title, it no longer functions as the adjective for "with the words". Beyond that the phrase makes no sense to anything I am talking about or even what I know.

Next: "If you want to use the word "Collective Aware Consciousness" this is okay to start." - I have never used this phrase, so no, I don't want to use this phrase . . . plus it is a phrase not a 'word' as you have stated.
When I experienced it--my awareness was not localized to just my body

Next: "To understand knowing about it, it may initially require you to go over to some place that you love to be in to understand it completely."
- This sentence makes no sense at all, children form more coherent sentences than this.
Might require strong emotion to break through to it.


Furthermore, the entirety of your commentary makes no sense, addresses nothing I am talking about, and like all the other threads you have participated in, has derailed the notion, idea, topic of the thread into some moronic rambling of incoherency.
That is where I encountered the androgen archetype.

I am going to ask for you to be banned from here, as I feel you are not conducive to intelligent conversation. I am sorry.
You can always employ the handy "ignore" feature in your user control panel.
 
Okay, let's get back on topic with the Great Mother arhcetype, please. :)
 
Etu Matku,

You can go over to the hell area of dialogue. There is something there that is placed to Lunitik a little bit ago about the way certain life seeks to "cause" others to understand in a protracted way. It is really not able to be done within what is understood as tight regimes and sentence structures. Religion has tried to do this and what is the result? This is not what forms knowledge or experiences that are appreciated. There is also life that seeks to end new knowledge, feeling and misunderstanding it as threatening to them and to what they are doing that they can not continue to do, and this is not able to be done.

Anything that is interesting to you is able to be understood completely and added to. That is simple and easy. Within simple, easy, and interesting you are provided to your sight scenes and knowing what you search webs for and look into books about. From there you can say something interesting on a computer with someone else, if it is the case, that a computer remains life in your existence area.
Wow . . . I'm convinced it's me, I have no idea what you are saying, I consider myself rather well educated and well spoken, but what you write I cannot for the life of me comprehend.

Sorry :eek:
 
I have an idea . . . when you can't beat 'em - join 'em!


With the great unity to this when it doesn't have to be, you speak for there to be all things inside the whole and nothing is also trying to speak. Moving in spatial accuracy when only the tortured mind thinks inside any can't be moving forth, isn't yet (Liber 777, Clavicule of Solomon, Book of St. Cyprian).

We are none of us creating most likely in a vacuum dispersed omniscience, therefore all is unlike any.
 
Wow . . . I'm convinced it's me, I have no idea what you are saying, I consider myself rather well educated and well spoken, but what you write I cannot for the life of me comprehend.

Etu - it's possible that Allelyah's first language is not english, or that he/she learned english from somewhere not in the "states". SG and Lunitik seem to understand Allelyah just fine :) I don't think Allelyah is trying to be problematic, that's apparently just the way his/her brain works with language and philosophy.

I think it's interesting to try and understand someone that approaches a topic from a totally different angle than I do, even though I don't understand everything either...
 
Back to the Great Mother Archetype, I find it interesting that "God" for some cultures is neither male nor female. For example, the Great Spirit/Wanka Tanka for most Native American cultures was not viewed as either male or female, and some cultures viewed the Great Spirit as the embodiment of both male/female. So, the Great Spirit is both male and female; or neither male nor female.
 
Etu - it's possible that Allelyah's first language is not english, or that he/she learned english from somewhere not in the "states". SG and Lunitik seem to understand Allelyah just fine :) I don't think Allelyah is trying to be problematic, that's apparently just the way his/her brain works with language and philosophy.

I think it's interesting to try and understand someone that approaches a topic from a totally different angle than I do, even though I don't understand everything either...
Interesting, but not conducive to a discussion.
 
Back to the Great Mother Archetype, I find it interesting that "God" for some cultures is neither male nor female. For example, the Great Spirit/Wanka Tanka for most Native American cultures was not viewed as either male or female, and some cultures viewed the Great Spirit as the embodiment of both male/female. So, the Great Spirit is both male and female; or neither male nor female.
Agreed, it seems most earlier religions had either non-gender gods, or two ruling ones (the God & Goddess). Of course Jung's theory is not being dogmatic, and is approaching the Mother Archetype from a purely human viewpoint.

As you know I do not believe in god(s), but I would speculate that it would be genderless. I do on the other hand believe we have a Higher-Self (Dæmon) and this too is genderless.
 
Back
Top