It's ok guys. no need to argue. Once you all accept Islam, you will know the virgin birth is fact.
You don't have to accept Islam to know that.
Then we won't have to argue over literal vs parable. meaning of this parable vs meaning of that. Or even the when and where and why doesn't this timing make sense.
We Christians don't have a problem anyway

The posters here do not claim to be Christian, except Wil, and he refutes the veracity of the text as a whole, regardless of its content. Anything that smacks of mystagogy is anathema to him!
But seriously, most Christians don't see contradictions or dichotomies. It's only the fundamentalists who insist it can
only be
this or
that (it's all true; it's all analogy). What they can't see is the homogeneity of spirit and matter, the two worlds must forever be separate and distinct.
Or even the when and where and why doesn't this timing make sense.
Again, when someone bangs on about Scripture 'not making sense' you're most probably talking to a fundie of one stripe or another. This old chestnut is well past its 'use by' date.
Today there's just too much good scholarship out there to make such narrow-minded assertions. Of course the fundies argue as if their particular viewpoint is infallible and inerrant, and they write off any contrary viewpoint as bias or prejudice, ignorance or superstition. The fundie is really the last bastion of 'blind faith' in action, with a generic set of rules that validates every position other than their own (which, curiously, they cannot bring themselves to see) ... but good luck!