God is not to Mock

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shibolet
  • Start date Start date
Shibolet said:
Abraham left Ur of the Sumerians because of their idolatry. He did find the same in Canaan but he concluded that the whole world was crowded with idolatry. So, he decided to stay in Canaan and stopped running from the nature of man by forming a People who would promote the absolute Monotheism of HaShem. His seed to this day promote the truth of the absolute Unity of HaShem.
Click to expand...

Then we can meet with this unity.

For me, monotheism doesn't matter, but the unification of Gods is important towards understanding that transcendent union.

I actually think that a pantheon can be useful in various ways, it sets clear distinction between roles or aspects of divinity, thus helps in overall understanding.

What the monotheist fails to understand is that Devi just means divine being... these aren't Gods, as HaShem is God.... they are Gods with attributes - Seguna Brahman. They are as Angels...

Always, even in the most extreme cases of polytheism, there is this God without attributes, transcendent, all pervasive.... etc. The rest being aspects of that...

Monotheism is not new, it is just fanatical insistence on Nirguna Brahman over Seguna Brahman. I do not think, psychologically, this is helpful. You become insistent, separatist, as is seen in Moses becoming angry because of cow worship.

This is very divisive, although I can understand why.

The Yogi says "ok, ok, cool"... he will then look to see if this is authentic divinity.... whether it is teaching union. If it is, he can use it to show them Nirguna Brahman as direct experience...

This is the proof of Yoga, you.
 
So, while Yoga has its own way, it can use anything.

It is because he lives in a united way, thus recognizes the unity of all.

Even without a scripture, he can use your life as the example.

Creating a distinct doctrine just creates believers.

The Yogi is not a believer.

He wants proof, and becomes that proof.
 
SatyamAbhidi said:
Then we can meet with this unity.

For me, monotheism doesn't matter, but the unification of Gods is important towards understanding that transcendent union.

I actually think that a pantheon can be useful in various ways, it sets clear distinction between roles or aspects of divinity, thus helps in overall understanding.

What the monotheist fails to understand is that Devi just means divine being... these aren't Gods, as HaShem is God.... they are Gods with attributes - Seguna Brahman. They are as Angels...

Always, even in the most extreme cases of polytheism, there is this God without attributes, transcendent, all pervasive.... etc. The rest being aspects of that...

Monotheism is not new, it is just fanatical insistence on Nirguna Brahman over Seguna Brahman. I do not think, psychologically, this is helpful. You become insistent, separatist, as is seen in Moses becoming angry because of cow worship.

This is very divisive, although I can understand why.

The Yogi says "ok, ok, cool"... he will then look to see if this is authentic divinity.... whether it is teaching union. If it is, he can use it to show them Nirguna Brahman as direct experience...

This is the proof of Yoga, you.
Click to expand...

And every one in the world has his or her right to believe whatever he or she pleases. Be it Paganism, Polytheism, Hinduism or Monotheism. But no one has the right to vandalize the Faith of another to build that of his own.
 
Shibolet said:
And every one in the world has his or her right to believe whatever he or she pleases. Be it Paganism, Polytheism, Hinduism or Monotheism. But no one has the right to vandalize the Faith of another to build that of his own.
Click to expand...

I agree I believe every faith has knowledge to offer.
 
Shibolet said:
And every one in the world has his or her right to believe whatever he or she pleases. Be it Paganism, Polytheism, Hinduism or Monotheism. But no one has the right to vandalize the Faith of another to build that of his own.
Click to expand...

And no one has...

We see your weak point...

That hundreds of years after the rabbi Jesus was gone his followers formed a new belief system....using what they thought was good of what he was raised on mixed with what he taught...

This is normal to build a house on a foundation...

Do you even find Jews to agree with you on this? I've been asking and haven't found any...

this is as bad as the jews for jesus crowd
 
wil said:
And no one has...

We see your weak point...

That hundreds of years after the rabbi Jesus was gone his followers formed a new belief system....using what they thought was good of what he was raised on mixed with what he taught...

This is normal to build a house on a foundation...

Do you even find Jews to agree with you on this? I've been asking and haven't found any...

this is as bad as the jews for jesus crowd
Click to expand...

Are you sure? Judaism puts a lot of value in the Law while Paul said that it was abolished. (Ephe. 2:15) This is vandalism of Judaism. So, the followers of Paul formed a belief system against Judaism and you find nothing wrong with it? And you say that's normal to build a house on a foundation of another. All Jews agree with me; they just don't like to talk about religion with Christians. The difference from me is that I do.

The "Jews-for-Jesus" are Christians disguised as Jews who have accepted Jesus as Christians do.
 
Horse crap....

All Jews do not agree with you. I attend two different synagogues, my business partner, lawyer and accountant are Jews... I've discussed your ramblings and pointed them to your posts for reaction...

they shake their head in confusion.

Yes, Jews for Jesus are frauds....hence my reason for mentioning them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top