The difficulty of writing the King James Bible version

Nick the Pilot

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,848
Reaction score
98
Points
48
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Let there be light: Handwritten draft of King James Bible reveals the secrets of its creation

http://www.salon.com/2015/10/28/let..._reveals_the_secrets_of_its_creation_partner/

"The King James Bible may well be the greatest work of literature ever written by committee—and now we know a bit more about the collaboration that produced it.

"Jeffrey Allen Miller, an English professor at Montclair State University conducting research at Cambridge announced a remarkable discovery last week: “in the archives of Sidney Sussex College there survives now the earliest known draft of any part of the King James Bible, unmistakably in the hand of one of the King James translators.”

"The manuscript was written by Samuel Ward, who was 32 when he became one of seven men at Cambridge charged with translating the biblical Apocrypha for inclusion in the edition, and who would eventually became master of Sidney Sussex College until his death in 1643. The material in the manuscript discovered by Miller covers apocryphal books known as Esdras and Wisdom, and it seems to indicate that the process of translation at Cambridge worked differently from what we thought we knew about it. It had long been assumed that the six separate teams, or companies, of translators who were based across Cambridge, Oxford, and London which had been assigned individual sections of the Bible to work on operated more collaboratively on certain sections than individually."

(cont.)
 
Interesting... It would be great to find their assignment...their challenge...the specifications on how they were to translate...
 
Wil,

It is a fascinating story. I had no idea there was so much "political intrigue" involved in the writing of the King James version. I also did not know there were so many "competing versions" that were also written at about the same time.
 
No real surprise to anyone who understands that the Bible is a work of men, bringing their mortal views into what they wrote. As more discoveries of this kind are made it becomes more and more unreasonable to accept that the Bible was handed down from some divine entity. It has been altered time and time again according to the whims of men from which the times in which they lived.
 
No real surprise to anyone who understands that the Bible is a work of men, bringing their mortal views into what they wrote. As more discoveries of this kind are made it becomes more and more unreasonable to accept that the Bible was handed down from some divine entity. It has been altered time and time again according to the whims of men from which the times in which they lived.
Not necessarily, I think. There are many ways where the spirit of the Word of God may survive the translations through the divine or academia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lux
This brings up the question: Does the present-day Bible contain parts that were intentionally changed from the original? I think there are some parts that were intentionally changed.
 
So this new information is not new?
Not from what I can see in the article. It's an opinion piece, rather than 'new information'.

The 'genius' of the KJ bible is the language – it's not about scholarly this or theological that or some political conspiracy – it's about how it reads. Today it's seen as quaint, but then so is the writing of William Shakespeare, but that doesn't mean it's not uplifting. Some of Shakespeare's stuff can bring tears to the eye, make you laugh, move your soul ... that's what King James was after. Why can't an English version of the Bible be as poetic and lyrical?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lux
The KJV is not without it's faults and it does take quite a bit of discernment to get the meaning of some passages, but for my money, it's still the best English translation of the Bible that we have.
 
Well it certainly isn't the only or most modernized for today's language and idioms, or arguably the most accurate...but it was King James Version and since then they decided to give us the new and improved king James version and. The standard and revised standard and new devised standard and llamsa studied aramaic and peshita? And the message and and President Jefferson had his shot....
 
The KJV is the only Bible my dad ever read from. Usually with the Strong's Concordance and Hebrew and Geek dictionaries nearby for good measure. Someone once gave my dad what I think was an NIV bible. I remember him reading through it for an hour or so with a puzzled look on his face. When he finished he joked, "Saints preserve us. The sons of Kane done rewrote to Bible.":)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top