Ahanu
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,374
- Reaction score
- 589
- Points
- 108
Isn't that a contemporary assumption? There's no suggestion of exploitation or usury in the text.
Scholars agree this parable parallels the story of Archelaus. According to Josephus, those that protested Archelaus' appointment as king abhorred the fact he wanted his subjects "to make liberal presents to himself, to his domestics and friends, and to such of his slaves as were vouchsafed the favour on being his tax gatherers." The lavish lifestyle of such rulers contributed to the destruction of the Jewish people (Ant. 17.299–314). Here we understand how these two slaves made so much money. Exploitation.
Last edited: