Ridicule away, but the statement is scientifically, empirically, demonstrably true.
... no I don't expect to change their minds ...
Well, save your breath then!
But if the book can be labeled for what it is ...
Ah, there's the rub!
Labelled according to whom?
You would never accept
my labelling,
I can't accept
your labelling, neither of
us like
his labelling and all three of
us have problems with
hers ... and so it goes.
And still ... despite the labelling, people will construe it to mean exactly what they want.
+++
As soon as the American constitution allowed freedom of religious expression, you opened the door to exactly this sort of thing. The literalist problem is one you've created for yourself. A particularly form of Americanism has inflicted it on the Book. The Book was there before America, and it will be there when America (in its current form) has gone, so I see no reason to alter the book to accommodate the illiterati.
In fact, this rather indicates why freedom of religious expression was always a bad idea!
The Roman Catholic Church has published '
The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church' which has been available for the past 25 years and, if read and digested, would sort out the kind of problems you encounter ... again, I'm sure the people that really need it would never bother to read it, and dismiss it's content if they did.