Veiling the light that blinds?too many of the veils being parted?
Veiling the light that blinds?too many of the veils being parted?
Nah, it depends on what you are holding onto...So it's direct contradiction between material/natural law (hold on) and spiritual law (let go)?
Attachments.Faith? Distrust? Material goods? Envy?
Nah, it depends on what you are holding onto...
Faith? Distrust? Material goods? Envy?
Anyone can have faith in something, however, I do not believe Faith in God is harmful
I'm going to match your ignorance and say ... I'm not that schooled on Lacan!I'm going to show my ignorance, but didn't Lacan say similar things about the Real?
Phew! Heavy stuff ...I'm going to match your ignorance and say ... I'm not that schooled on Lacan!
Had a look at a definition here at the Real à la Lacan and I can see a similarity, if we allow the radical differences ... glad to dialogue this, but I'm no expert ... interesting lead, though, so thanks for that, if this is as far as it goes.
I didn't say that. Good and bad things happen with no particular pattern. Sometimes random stuff happens for no reason. Life is unpredictable, not necessarily from cause and effectSo when something harmful results from faith, it was wrong faith, not proper faith in God?
Sounds like an easy cop-out to me.
What I meant by cause and effect is two-fold. On the one hand looking at the Book of Job. Job was a good man, he reverently gave sacrifices honoring God. A demon comes along to throw lots with God against Job's faith. God agrees and the demon made Job's life miserable. The lesson here is stuff happens, Job did nothing wrong or against God but bad things happened to him. There life is unpredictable. In the Old Testament God continually warned Israel to behave themselves and turn from their evil ways until they were punished by God again and again.I agree that good and bad things happen very unpredictably.
As you know, I don't think it follows from that, that our actions don't have consequences or that we can't have any influence on the course of events.
I realize I misunderstood how you used the word "not harmful", which I took to mean a cause-and-effect relationship as in "causes no harm". Can you go into a bit more detail? Did you mean "it has no effect at all"? Still not sure I get you.