Im not trying to be a smart Alec here but I think you missed the link to the author your wrongly attributing to me, is Sayed MS Nasser if you look, I was trying to make the point that people from all different faiths and backgrounds seem to have issues with Paul not just myself. It was in the hope that I am not some Christian fundamentalist lonewolf tinfoil hat wearing UFO nerd ....but RJM CORBET is doing a great job himself painting me as one hahahaha
No, what you're saying is 'we only find out by reading into Josephus stuff that isn't there'We only find out why by deciphering the writings of Josephus, a Pharisee historian of the era whose writings clearly cover up Paul’s events in Rome.
Saulus. Different person. They were brothers. Josephus does not specify the parents, but the name 'Costobar' provides a clue: their grandfather was very likely Costobar(us), the second husband of Salome, the sister of Herod the Great. Paul was born in Cilicia, and refers to himself as "of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee" (Philemon 3:5). The Herodians were not Benjamite. The Herodians and the Pharisees were different cults.In Wars (II; 20:1; p.497) he refers to Costobaurus and Saul ...
LOL. Look, here's a man called Paul. And hers's a man called Saulus, living in the same century ... they must be the same person, that they have radically different heritages only proves someone is lying.Clearly, it is highly improbable that these similarities are coincidental.
Not 'clear' at all ... dependent on drawing conclusions not supported by the texts themselves.
Nope, I've already explained that. Kinship with Herodian and a load of others.In addition, Josephus emphasises Saulus having a Roman royal connection through Agrippa (not King Agrippa). Paul claimed kinship with Herodian, a name associated with the reigning dynasty of Judea living in Rome (Rom 16:11).
Nope.Thus, Paul may have had a connection with the Roman royal family through Herod Antipas.
To Judaism? Since when was Paul converting people to Judaism?Josephus relates how this learned Jew stole money donated for the temple at Jerusalem by a Roman woman named Fulvia, who had converted to Judaism—obviously one of Paul’s gentile converts.
Wrong. Paul collected money for the mother church in Jerusalem from the communities he founded. No evidence at all that he kept the money for himself. A spurious lie.This fits the picture we construct in our book of Paul’s taking of money for preaching and his failure to ever deliver such money to Jerusalem as “charity” as he claimed he would.
Also wrong — we can date these events from Josephus and others, and this happened about 49AD, more than ten years before Paul arrived in Rome, so the un-named Jew cannot be Paul.
See? Too many errors. Too much reading what's not there. Too many assumptions and assertions without foundation. Too many sleight-of-hand tricks to hold water. Too much fabrication.