How about adultery? 100 lashes on the evidence of four witnesses? Or do you prefer the OT penalty of death by stoning?Don't be so hasty.
Can you prove without a shadow of doubt, that the accused is guilty?
..bearing in mind that if somebody commits false-witness to a sin punishable by death, they are doomed.
The story is possibly true [ that Jesus said "will you cast the first stone" ]
However, it is also possible that the story is misconstrued or exaggerated.
We only find the story in John?![]()
I'm in complete agreement with all you say hereMurderers very often have mental disorders which are at the root of the violent behavior, but for various reasons don't accept or have access to treatment which would prevent the violence. In any case, mental disorder or not, society moves to protect its members and prevent murderers from killing more people. It's less about a penalty and more about managing a threat, from that perspective. No other justification is necessary, least of all recourse to ancient texts which are notoriously hard to interpret in a unified, consensus way.
There are other perspectives, such as the sense of justice for the bereaved.
Death penalty has the massive drawback of being irreversible in the case of misjudgement. It also tends to get applied more to the disenfranchised than the elites, as history and current events show.
All in all, whatever God's reported stance on the isssue, I believe it is a problem that belongs exclusively to the human sphere, not the divine one, and is best left to those of us who can actually be affected by murder, to find solutions and manage the threat. Civil justice systems, separation of power, all those goodies of modern secular liberal democracies are something I would not want to miss.
Last edited: