Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
NO.Is there more?
"Bhasmibhootasya dehasya, punaragamanam kutah?"
After the body turns to ashes, where is the coming back? - Charvaks said this before Buddha's time.
NO.Is there more?
NO.
"Bhasmibhootasya dehasya, punaragamanam kutah?"
After the body turns to ashes, where is the coming back? - Charvaks said this before Buddha's time.
I'm confused, you state that you turn back to dust, do you believe that a sentient, biologically complex organism such as ourselves simply emerges from dust? Then you claim the existence of a 'deity' that you are a 'part' of for eternity.Dust. My end.
The same as for any tree, sparrow, anything.
But that's alright. I was dead for countless billions of years before life, and that was alright.
After my end it can be alright again.
I am a to tiny miniscule part of the whole, the Diety, and every part of me always will be.
For humans to imagine that they have some special future, something more than other lifeform, is strange to me .
Hello Amir...I'm confused, you state that you turn back to dust, do you believe that a sentient, biologically complex organism such as ourselves simply emerges from dust? Then you claim the existence of a 'deity' that you are a 'part' of for eternity.
Do you not believe you have a Soul of some sort? What's the point of this deity if you come from dust and return to dust? Why would you find "humans to imagine that they have some special future, something more than other lifeform," . . . but you find belief in an unproven, external deity to be plausible?
There is plenty of evidence for a Greater Self within us all, and zero evidence for an external god. The very fact that Proto-man was just one of many animal species fighting for survival over the millennia and his brain, despite natural selective evolutionary mechanisms that apply to all species, evolved far beyond any other species, demonstrates 'deliberate cause'. And this implies an Isolate Intelligence/Consciousness working through our physical being (brain/body), a Soul/Psyche separate from the objective universe and its physical laws and limitations.
This Soul/Psyche does not behave as though it were merely a “sum total” of the brain’s sensory and manipulative capacities, combining and recombining inputted information as though it were an “organic” electronic computer. It has a sense of identity, a sense of uniqueness, a sense of distance, and differentiation from everything else that exists. In the case of proto-man, natural selection would occur in favor of almost anything else besides the brain. He would become stronger, hairier, tougher, meaner, and faster. According to natural selection, you and I should be gorillas.
But we are not gorillas. Indeed, as our intelligence has made life progressively easier for us, we have become weaker and more vulnerable physically. We are healthier and more long-lived only because our intelligence has enabled us to produce medicines to stave off diseases, and dietary standards to maximize our health and growth potential. We have controlled environments to fend off the elements, and have developed weapons to fend off other creatures.
I am interested in knowing what your religion/faith's End Goal is in regards to your physical demise (Death)?
I am an adherent of the Left Hand Path and my belief lies in the transference of my conscious awareness to my Greater Self/GodSelf and the individual Subjective Reality I am creating. For us, this is the form of Self-Deification spoken about with LHP Adherents.
What are your Beliefs?
It'll take more than five minutes to read your post.Assume that your death is going to take place in five minutes!
Reply removed at user's own requestIt'll take more than five minutes to read your post.
He's going to die unenlightened, I think.....
Now this is a "mega post". Meg Posts generally contain verbiage. But strangely, this post is pure verbiage. I congratulate you for posting this.Assume that your death is going to take place in five minutes! If you are in this mood forever, ..
Reply removed at user's own requestI read the post from the first word to the last and here is my reply:
Now this is a "mega post". Meg Posts generally contain verbiage. But strangely, this post is pure verbiage. I congratulate you for posting this.
Of course everyone dies, but no reason we should be constantly thinking about it. We also have a life to live. I have never worried about death. I know exactly what happens. I am an atheist. I never think about any God, unless forced to do so by theist posts.
No, you do NOT know "what happens" .. nobody does !Of course everyone dies, but no reason we should be constantly thinking about it. We also have a life to live. I have never worried about death. I know exactly what happens. I am an atheist. I never think about any God, unless forced to do so by theist posts.
True.....nobody knows.No, you do NOT know "what happens" .. nobody does !
How can science observe what happens to be non-observable?If you take the help of science, then everything becomes clear.
I do agree.True.....nobody knows.
Might as well live our lives to the full.
Don't you agree?
What makes you think that there is an non-observable? Why should I assume otherwise?How can science observe what happens to be non-observable?
It can't .. it can only show you a dead physical body.
You might assume that there is none other than physical manifestation..
..but billions of people assume that the physical is not all that is.
No .. you are just 'hiding' behind science .. you can't hide from truth.
I can acknowledge your belief in divine guidance, it's just that I don't believe in an aware, interested or involved divinity. I see nature as the guvnor and so I do live every moment as best I can.I do agree.
However, Divine guidance is there for our benefit, and is not there to make us miserable.
On the contrary..
To me, that is an untenable position.What makes you think that there is an non-observable? Why should I assume otherwise?
It's true that our science cannot prove anything about afterlife. As each new age is entered , so humanity looks back and realises how poor our knowledge was before. And that will be the case again...and again.To me, that is an untenable position.
"science" is confined to what we observe/understand at this point in time.
It is therefore not a basis for assuming that only what is known today, due to "science" is all there is.
No .. we cannot make reliable decisions about theological matters solely on current scientific knowledge.
You don't actually know .. you just prefer to say that there is no soul .. no life after death etc.
If you show me the evidence, then I will believe.It is therefore not a basis for assuming that only what is known today, due to "science" is all there is.
No .. we cannot make reliable decisions about theological matters solely on current scientific knowledge.
You don't actually know .. you just prefer to say that there is no soul .. no life after death etc.