Djinn (all spiritual creatures) are pathological complexes that connect the Karcist with archetypal structures. They embody a value that can detriment or benefit the individual person depending on how their value is used.Sorry, no offence. You said djinns are mythological, and I asked if the term was being used in the sense of imaginary -- not real? Does this mean they are imaginary?
Would it matter? Would it affect the outcome of the magic ritual whether or not the entity was real or was a purely mental construct -- a placebo like effect?
What is your opinion, is the opposite also true, i.e. is a partial epileptic seizure affecting the temporal lobe always a spiritual experience?Spiritual Agency takes place after portions of the brain are disinhibited and can be the result of a neurological disorder, medical complications, and/or the result of prolonged activity, such as a ritual operation/trance induction, in which these portions of the brain are engaged and eventually disinhibited.
I don't think so, it 'can' lead to spiritual epiphanies, but usually it leads to an unpleasant, uncontrolled brain malfunction.What is your opinion, is the opposite also true, i.e. is a partial epileptic seizure affecting the temporal lobe always a spiritual experience?
The 'Octopuss' helmet works for some people and not for others. There is a magnetic field generator which is much stronger than Persinger's helmet. My stance on drugs and religious experiences is that the drug can only simulate/mirror a religious experience, it is 'not' the religious experience, does not create the religious experience. As for Majiqal Work, a clear, diamond-like focused mind is the ideal mind.What is your take on the "god helmet" which stimulates certain areas of the brain magnetically, triggering similar experiences? How about entheogens?
I would say no. A well-programmed, well-executed Majiqal Operation by an experienced Karcist is far more controllable and extraordinary. As for Individuating through Majiqal Work, yes good Ritual Work can lead to various depths of Individuation.In your opinion and experience, are these equivalent to the lengthy spiritual practices you also mention, in terms of facilitating processes like individuation?
Thanks again. A lot of it is quite complicated, but in the end I suppose I take the view that the Spirit reality is the true reality, that weaves the space/time dimension of nature to which we are limited by corporeal restraints.Djinn (all spiritual creatures) are pathological complexes that connect the Karcist with archetypal structures. They embody a value that can detriment or benefit the individual person depending on how their value is used.
Reality is not a simple subject. Reality is what we perceive to be real, there is no underlying absolute reality that exists independently of perception. The only way we are capable of knowing reality is through the mediation of our consciousness - that is, subjectively (the observer creates their reality).
Plato developed a two-layer view of reality, the World of Becoming and the World of Being. The World of Becoming is the physical world we perceive through our senses. This world is always in movement, always changing. The World of Being is the world of forms, or ideas, the Platonic First Forms, and the Egyptian Neteru. It is absolute, independent, and transcendent. The World of Being never changes and yet causes the essential nature of things we perceive in the world of Becoming.
If spiritual creatures were objectively real/corporeal entities, that would most certainly affect 'everything' to do with the ritual! Summoning ‘demon powers,’ Crowley says, involves uncovering or fostering related abilities in oneself through the exercise:
If, then, I say, with Solomon:
“The Spirit Cimieries teaches logic,” what I mean is:
“Those portions of my brain which subserve the logical faculty may be stimulated and developed by following out the processes called ‘The Invocation of Cimieries.”
______________
Aleister Crowley
Demonic "presences" are not surprising and in no way negatively reflect on the person having the experience. It is a normal and natural happening to a disinhibited temporal lobe. A brief talk with any sirius practitioner will bring you to your senses as to the monumental amount of preparation and grueling work that is needed to properly instill the specifics of the spirit being conjured into one's psyche, the long arduous repetitive process of ritually disinhibiting the temporal lobe (particularly the left temporoparietal junction), and then creating the appropriate platform for which to experience this spirit.
Aleister Crowley, had at the time, a unique view of the Goetic demons. Instead of actual entities, he saw them as aspects of a person’s mind, Jung would agree. He believed one could control these aspects through ritualistic preparation. By commanding a specific demon or energy, one would be able to tap into a part of the unconscious mind and access this archetype and possibly gain occult (hidden) knowledge.
Back in the ‘old’ days (Neolithic to be exact) they drilled holes in your skull to let out the demons, this is called Trepanning. The funny thing they weren’t that far off base as the brain’s temporal lobe is the location of the entry point to the release of “referenced material” from other sections of the brain. This reference material comes in the form of “psychic” or “spiritual” phenomena, out-of-body and near-death experiences, alien abductions, past lives experiences, one’s earlier repressed traumatic memories and the mystical or God experience . . . and seeing demons/angels.
Carl Jung believed that an encounter with the demon or monster represented an archetypal stage in the process of individuation. He says, “the initial encounter with the Self casts a dark shadow ahead of time.” In mythic terms, the shadow may present itself as a monster, a demon, a darkness, or a drought. Here is the full quote from Jung’s Man and His Symbols:
“Many myths and fairy tales symbolically describe this initial stage in the process of individuation by telling of a king who has fallen ill or grown old. Other familiar story patterns are that a royal couple is barren; or that a demon keeps the king’s army or his ship from proceeding on its course; or that darkness hangs over the lands, wells dry up, and flood, drought, and frost afflict the country. Thus it seems as if the initial encounter with the Self casts a dark shadow ahead of time, or as if the “inner friend” comes at first like a trapper to catch the helplessly struggling ego in his snare.”
(Carl Jung, Man & His Symbols, p.167)
The emergence of the Self may bring forth the shadows, the monsters, the demons. The shadow betokens a shift in consciousness: we become aware of the demon first; then we battle the demon. Demonic “presences” are a normal and natural happening to a disinhibited temporal lobe, some institutionalized temporal lobe psychotics have daily communications with spiritual entities. Though, it is suggested that if you are experiencing these psychopathological disturbances in your normal everyday life, you might consider a psychiatric evaluation.
When Swiss scientists electrically stimulated an epileptic patient’s brain, things got really spooky. The patient reported a shadow person sitting behind her, copying her every move. When she sat up, it also sat up. When she bent forward and grabbed her knees, it reached around her body and held her. The doctors then told her to read a card, but the shadow person tried to take it out of her hand.
What happened was the scientists had stimulated the left temporoparietal junction, the part of the brain that defines the idea of self. By interfering with the area that helps us tell the difference between ourselves and others, the doctors screwed up the brain’s ability to understand its own body, thus leading to the creation of a copycat shadow person. Researchers are hoping this is the key to understanding why so many people, both schizophrenic and healthy, encounter shadow beings and other creatures like aliens.
However, if we are purposely disinhibiting the temporal lobe, for instance through ‘prolonged’ ritual work, then we may expect to experience an occasional visitor or two in our chamber. I say ‘prolonged’ because those of us who have earnestly committed to this Work have come to realize that in order to create the conditions that will properly induce communication with some sort of archetypal energy, it is necessary to take on an extremely long, focused, and disciplined process. This process varies from several long focused hours to days and even weeks or months in order to shut off the objective and engage the subjective.
Unfortunately, even after days of ritual work, there is a slim chance of communication. However, not even the most gifted and/or evolved Magi can chirp a few neat Latin or Sumerian words and summon forth anything more than wishful thinking. To further these ideas one would look into developing a controlled method of disinhibiting the left temporoparietal junction lobe after a prolonged and disciplined preparation for ritual work.
Spiritual Agency takes place after portions of the brain are disinhibited and can be the result of a neurological disorder, medical complications, and/or the result of prolonged activity, such as a ritual operation/trance induction, in which these portions of the brain are engaged and eventually disinhibited.
A great number of those belonging to 'Google' these days, I believe.The analogy ends there, because the real internet is just other peoples’ computers..
I go with Plato’s cave: that our material existence is a shadow play of the true reality.
Thank youI think plato knew GOD had been a real living Great King and could look upon the weal and understand that everyone was fed, everyone was safe and everyone was included. philosophy is easy stuff then.
material existence should be a shadow of that reality. imho
this is probably really out of place here...sorry
peace
Thank you
I am not the type to get deeply involved in the arcane magical symbolism.
I go with Plato’s cave: that our material existence is a shadow play of the true reality. I analogise the brain as a computer that performs mechanical functions, but which has a greater function of access to the internet. When the computer is broken, it can’t perform the mechanical functions, but also loses internet access.
The analogy ends there, because the real internet is just other peoples’ computers. I believe Spirit is the house that permeates and surrounds and contains the room of nature, to which our corporeal form limits us by time and space. I believe there are many, perhaps infinite other rooms/dimensions than just our timespace dimension of nature. My Father’s house has many mansions.
Thank you. Yes. Perhaps with a physical key all that's needed is get possession of it, then turn it in the lock. But Imo a 'spiritual' key demands personal energy from the user. The key itself is useless without the personal quality needed to be able to turn it -- or whatever the word?Interesting. Do I understand your analogy correctly if I pose another analogy: The brain you describe is like a radio receiver? In working condition and depending on the tuned wavelength, various stations (~mind states) can be accessed?
It is a bit of a one-way setup, though. I like the implications of the internet model better. Even though nowadays we use our computers a lot like radio receivers, the internet protocol which ensures the data gets to us, does not differentiate between servers and clients. All connected devices can, in principle, be servers of information. And even in the Radio analogy, we can imagine the Ham Radio operators broadcasting as well as receiving.
Actually, that's a nice analogy for a magician in the spiritual sense: Someone working in the spiritual "field" a lot like a Ham radio operator would use the radio waves, or a computer nerd who runs their own mail or web server at home. Most people are not into the technical details that need to be addressed constantly, in either case.
What do you think?
I would take it further than being able to pick up 'thoughts' from the material world, to also being able to receive spiritual vibrations -- or whatever the word -- from beyond our dimension of nature? We are so limited, imoInteresting. Do I understand your analogy correctly if I pose another analogy: The brain you describe is like a radio receiver?
Plato believed the universe was a sort of intelligence and that the (Platonic First) forms existed in a realm of existence each person visits when he dies. Plato also believed in reincarnation, that people die and are reborn. Plato also developed the idea of some sort of entity that is responsible for creation, growth, and destruction in the universe. Not an intelligence, per se, but rather some force contained within the realm of existence that does these things.I think plato knew GOD had been a real living Great King and could look upon the weal and understand that everyone was fed, everyone was safe and everyone was included. philosophy is easy stuff then.
material existence should be a shadow of that reality. imho
this is probably really out of place here...sorry
peace
Plato believed the universe was a sort of intelligence and that the (Platonic First) forms existed in a realm of existence each person visits when he dies. Plato also believed in reincarnation, that people die and are reborn. Plato also developed the idea of some sort of entity that is responsible for creation, growth, and destruction in the universe. Not an intelligence, per se, but rather some force contained within the realm of existence that does these things.
In this respect Plato seemed to have stumbled upon the very definition of Modern Satanism;
Adherents see the character of Satan as an archetype of pride, carnality, liberty, enlightenment, undefiled wisdom, and of a cosmos perceive to be motivated by a dark evolutionary force of entropy and negentropy that permeates all of nature providing the drive for survival and propagation which is inherent in all living things.
Zarathustra is The Man! But no, I don't think Plato was 'simply' plagiarizing Zoroastrian philosophy. Philosophies build off one another, they are not meant to be unparalleled closed systems of thought.so you don't believe he was just ripping off Zoroaster. that what he really stumbled on was plagiarism.
I'll keep that in mind.Zarathustra is The Man! But no, I don't think Plato was 'simply' plagiarizing Zoroastrian philosophy. Philosophies build off one another, they are not meant to be unparalleled closed systems of thought.
Zarathustra is The Man! But no, I don't think Plato was 'simply' plagiarizing Zoroastrian philosophy. Philosophies build off one another, they are not meant to be unparalleled closed systems of thought.