I'm just chuckling slightly that although they seem to want to be taken seriously as registered satanists, they seem to find ridiculous the idea that others may resent them seriously in the desire to channel dark forces? Most people don't encourage evil close around them -- which is what Satan represents to most?
lolGiven that some Christian denominations are actively praying for the destruction of this world, to hasten the return of Jesus, and that such groups would likely not encounter the bureaucratic difficulties these would-be satanists are facing, any concern about evil intentions seems to be irrelevant in the decision making process at the university.
Agreed. I was playing devil's advocate, as it were.lol
Still the average person equates Satanism with devil worship = evil intentions. Most folks don't go further. Words like Paganism don't provoke in the same way, imo
I did not see anything resembling that in the article. If people preparing an open letter fit your idea of "freaking out" you must have led a rather sheltered existence.People freaking out about minutia?
I too doubt the long-term significance of this event. Hence my sharing RJM's chuckle. Nonetheless,shared as significant...
is always something that I am alert to and take very seriously.the thin end of the wedge
I'm just chuckling slightly that although they seem to want to be taken seriously as registered satanists, they seem to find ridiculous the idea that others may resent them seriously in the desire to channel dark forces? Most people don't encourage evil close around them -- which is what Satan represents to most?
"According to them, the complaint claimed that the club wanted to summon Satan to the University of Adelaide and that "occultists are always involved in criminal activity".
Ashley said both contentions were untrue.
They said they were unaware of anyone in the club believing in "the literal Satan existing" and rituals were not part of the club's activities since its 30 members had such varying beliefs."
I think it's really just an attempt to thumb the nose at traditional values?
My main concern is that the club is for Pagans and Satanists among others. As someone who owes a great deal to Paganism in its Druidry form, I have as much in common with a Satanist as I do with a Jehovah's witness or a Sunni Muslim. If they have banded together because they fear discrimination then those fears would seem justified.
Although I do see why you chuckle, I am always aware of the thin end of the wedge.
Thank you @Ella S. That is helpful. It is a subject I know very little about. I did try to do a little research some years ago but the websites I looked at were rather over the top on the gothic imagery and heavy rock. In the seventies, I read LaVey's 'Satanic Bible' but was not impressed.
There are many different groups involved with Satanism, and I've never bothered to read much about these, but some of the folks who follow some Left Hand Paths (and others) 'speak' with such clear direct honesty about themselves and their beliefs that I don't mind reading them. Other groups seem to be total nutcases. But then I know of some Christian groups that are totally daft or even dangerous, so Satanism, LHP, Witchcrafts and all have their interesting and crazy sections just the same, I guess.Thank you @Ella S. That is helpful. It is a subject I know very little about. I did try to do a little research some years ago but the websites I looked at were rather over the top on the gothic imagery and heavy rock. In the seventies, I read LaVey's 'Satanic Bible' but was not impressed.
I recall reading somewhere that Hebraic angelology emerged as beliefs moved away from poly- to monotheism. In early writings the God of Israel is much like their neighbours' Gods, only bigger, better, meaner, etc. As the idea of monotheism naturally evolved into 'there is only one God, and He's ours', the neighbours' deities were demoted to the lesser orders and, of course, 'demonised'."Polytheistic Satanism," ... is essentially just eclectic Neopaganism that treats demons as pagan gods.
Totally agree. I am a big fan of much in Modern Druidry, and I stress the word modern. It may or may not have anything to do with the ancient form and to be honest I am not really bothered.What does sadden me is how these can get connected to what (little) we know about the ancient Druids. Druidry has had a bad press for millennia and I wouldn't know how much is true about the ancient descriptions, only enemies seemed to write about them because (I've read that) much of the Druid way was secret.
I've often heard that all publicity is good publicity.This makes me so sad, occultism has already a bad reputation, it does not need more of this kind of publicity