I have modified the THINK before you speak adage.
Which to me is a modern adaptation of what my mom oft repeated..."if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all"
Is it _________? If not don't say it!
T true
H helpful
I inspirational
N necessary (oops edit i wrote nice at first)
K kind
There are a few more I like: contemplating how I would appreciate the words pointed towards me; would i be pleased if what i am thinking manifested right now; and will what I have to say improve upon the silence.
When I follow these guidelines it is like a fast... I can't speak, I set into full introspection, focusing on every thought, observing the observer and by the time I have something to say the conversation has moved on three topics and my thought is now either moot or not worthy of interrupting.
As my friends know I am normally vocal, often react instead of stopping to think and respond. Whether it is online or irl friends come to me in concern in these moments, "Are you alright? "
I am not a monk, as I said this contemplation throws me into silence if I follow it to the end degree.
Now my question. I have had many believers that justify grevious violations of the above thought. Their justification is always the fact that they know the truth and are only saying what they say because they love and care for my soul and wish to save me from eternal damnation.
This happens most often from Christians and Muslims...sometimes implied by Baha'i. Never by a Jew or Bhuddist or atheist. While I have run into some vocal Hindus, not from them either.
Some claim ordained or commanded by G!d to do so.
We fight this here by limiting proselytizing. Encouraging interfaith discussion and protecting interreligious discussion in our corrals.
Thoughts?
Which to me is a modern adaptation of what my mom oft repeated..."if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all"
Is it _________? If not don't say it!
T true
H helpful
I inspirational
N necessary (oops edit i wrote nice at first)
K kind
There are a few more I like: contemplating how I would appreciate the words pointed towards me; would i be pleased if what i am thinking manifested right now; and will what I have to say improve upon the silence.
When I follow these guidelines it is like a fast... I can't speak, I set into full introspection, focusing on every thought, observing the observer and by the time I have something to say the conversation has moved on three topics and my thought is now either moot or not worthy of interrupting.
As my friends know I am normally vocal, often react instead of stopping to think and respond. Whether it is online or irl friends come to me in concern in these moments, "Are you alright? "
I am not a monk, as I said this contemplation throws me into silence if I follow it to the end degree.
Now my question. I have had many believers that justify grevious violations of the above thought. Their justification is always the fact that they know the truth and are only saying what they say because they love and care for my soul and wish to save me from eternal damnation.
This happens most often from Christians and Muslims...sometimes implied by Baha'i. Never by a Jew or Bhuddist or atheist. While I have run into some vocal Hindus, not from them either.
Some claim ordained or commanded by G!d to do so.
We fight this here by limiting proselytizing. Encouraging interfaith discussion and protecting interreligious discussion in our corrals.
Thoughts?
Last edited: