To be honest, a frequent impression I have after philosophizing/theologizing here is that we are all just making this stuff up. And by all, I include the originators of all religions.
Is that because you assume the process they follow is the same as the process you follow?
You're not obliged to believe the processes they follow, you're not obliged to believe in Revelation, but if the foundation and source of religions are true – and by foundation I would day the discernment between the real and the illusory – then clearly they are not 'making it up'...
One participant here successfully nudged me back to a position of knowing that Ultimate Reality is to us an unknown, at least in the sense of clearly defined knowledge.
Well it's unknown because, in my Book, it transcends the faculties ... God is not a thing as other things are, therefore God is not knowable as other things are known.
But that doesn't mean one can know nothing ... or that there is not a different order of knowing.
I still believe that we are connected to that Unknown and it is not outside of what we would call our “self,” that is if we can sense the depths of self or being.
I whole-heartedly agree ... where problems arise is when people project an exemplary view of 'self' from the standpoint of their own selves.
What seems to have taken hold in my spiritual beliefs is similar to the old “fountain flowing deep and wide” that I encountered in my upbringing as a Christian, but it does not seem particularly Biblical.
Oh, but it is ... in a few places, probably notable in Jesus' dialgue with the Samaritan woman at the well:
"Jesus answered and told her, “Everyone who drinks of this water will thirst again; but whoever drinks from the water that I shall give him will most definitely never thirst ..." (John 4:13-14)
Also my dabbling in (reading about) quantum physics offered me a depth view of overall reality.
From the religions viewpoint, we would say the overall reality of this cosmos, or this universe ... but the stuff of which they speak transcends that.
This theoretical view of depth levels/layers in overall reality seems to match the ancient (Veda/Vedic?) distinction of gross body, subtle body, and causal body.
OK, but these are three veils ...
While philosopher Ken Wilber maintains that it is a mistake to equate psycho/spiritual “depth” with physical depth, I tend to think that deeper spirituality actually DOES involve going physically/literally deeper.
Why, when the spiritual has no physicality?
What I most believe to be truest, both metaphysically and in terms of psychological usefulness/functioning, is what I call “Depth-dynamic Being.” I trust that an abundance of good stuff comes from a really deep zone that we manage to somehow integrate with surface/physical reality. I think we can learn to maximize the “ fountain flowing” from a very deep zone and into an outermost surface zone. This metaphysical belief seems to work well with Christian concepts (with some translation), and I strongly suspect it is adaptable to other faith traditions as well.
Can you say anything about where the content of the 'really deep zone'?
I wonder why you believe your Depth-dynamic Being' is 'truest', when the same thing is same in all traditions?
I don't dispute your findings, and applaud the effort it took you to get there, and I would say it does work with Christian concepts, and Hindu concepts, and Hermetic concepts, because such concepts have been expressed in those traditions in their own language and lexicon.
I think if you really grasped the idea of the Logos as spoken of in Christianity, you'd see what you're looking for.
Modelling God onto Quantum Physics follows a long line, between the Ancient's modelling the Divine Temperament onto the weather, the Hellenists' idea of the Transcendentals – by no means a wasted effort, and certainly not wrong, but it can only ever be analogous, and no bad thing it that. It's when we take a step to far and say 'this is what God is' or 'this is how God does', then we're into the alchemists' search for the Philosopher's Stone as a material substance or the Holy Grail as a material cup.