The case of Jesus and the Chinese Emperor

[Craz]

I saw this, this morning and thought some of you might be interested.

The Case of Christ and the Chinese Emperor

The Chinese language is the oldest written language in the world. Like many ancient languages words are drawn as pictures to symbolize each meaning. The word for boat in Chinese is comprised of 3 d…

theunapologeticgeneration.com

 

[TheLightWithin]

I saw this, this morning and thought some of you might be interested.

The Case of Christ and the Chinese Emperor

The Chinese language is the oldest written language in the world. Like many ancient languages words are drawn as pictures to symbolize each meaning. The word for boat in Chinese is comprised of 3 d…

theunapologeticgeneration.com

I poked around the site, too, this person has some interesting ideas -- not sure what to make of some of them, but interesting for sure

 

[Craz]

I poked around the site, too, this person has some interesting ideas -- not sure what to make of some of them, but interesting for sure

I may try and learn to write Chinese. I am intrigued that each word is, in fact, a picture.

 

[RabbiO]

This very piece was brought up for discussion on another forum of which I am a member. One of the other members,
who does understand Chinese, explained why much of the article is incorrect. Since the comments were given on another forum I can’t copy and post them here and I don’t think I’m allowed to post a link to them.

I can, by the way, attest that in another article on the site where the writer discussing names mentions that the name Caiphas literally means man who vomits, he is incorrect

 

[RabbiO]

I poked around the site, too, this person has some interesting ideas -- not sure what to make of some of them, but interesting for sure

You mean like his piece from December 2020 regarding his vision that G-d would see to it that the election results would be nullified and Donald Trump would remain president?

 

[TheLightWithin]

You mean like his piece from December 2020 regarding his vision that G-d would see to it that the election results would be nullified and Donald Trump would remain president?

And his(?) dream about AOC?

 

[TheLightWithin]

But they also have some really good reflective pieces including on gender equality

Women Serving in Authority

Often, I read and hear that women can serve in the church but that they are not supposed to serve in an authoritative position. People will quote 1 Timothy 3:1-11 “It is a trustworthy statement: if any man aspires to the office of [a]overseer, it is a fine work he desires to do. 2 [b]An […]

theunapologeticgeneration.com

Wrong Mindsets: Sexism

Sex·ism ˈsekˌsizəm/ noun noun: sexism prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex. Today, we are made especially aware of mental stereotypes that we develop as human beings due to things we have heard or experienced – such as judging someone as...

theunapologeticgeneration.com

Jesus Didn't Preach a Gendered Gospel

gos·pel ˈɡäspəl/ noun 1. the teaching or revelation of Christ. 2. the record of Jesus’ life and teaching in the first four books of the New Testament. “[..] the apostle Paul consistently championed the principle of sexual equality within the Church and the home. He carefully avoided those...

theunapologeticgeneration.com

What's This Submit Stuff All About?

Are women commanded to be submissive? The answer is no. This article explores the original Greek text of Ephesians 5.

theunapologeticgeneration.com

 

[talib-al-kalim]

This very piece was brought up for discussion on another forum of which I am a member. One of the other members,
who does understand Chinese, explained why much of the article is incorrect. Since the comments were given on another forum I can’t copy and post them here and I don’t think I’m allowed to post a link to them.

I can, by the way, attest that in another article on the site where the writer discussing names mentions that the name Caiphas literally means man who vomits, he is incorrect

Links to restricted access sites that require membership may indeed be a problem. But quotes and summaries are always allowed.
The article quoted lacks concrete references to the claimed documents and it is clearly apologetic, so that I have doubts.
If you could point out the main traits of the opposing voice and the sources referred to, it would be very helpful.