otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
Loved that seamless cloth motion/metaphor.
What Am I?
- Thread starter 'Amir Alzzalam
- Start date
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
Great comment. Perhaps authentic Being and true Love are the “diving” and “harvesting” respectively.
Positive projection onto a god in the sky or out there somewhere, results from our normal thinking (“thinking like matter?”) being unable to wrap our minds around such a Mystery. Just as in negative projection that results from not being comfortable enough with “ugly” sides of ourselves, positive projection results from similarly not being able to own the divinity and ineffable beauty of a creation such as ourselves. One might say that false pride causes negative projection, and false humility cause positive humility. Earlier factor analysis of personalities found four main factors labeled : “introversion, extroversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism.”
False humility and positive projection and gathering only (or too much) could be caused from both a predisposition for and a cultivation of neuroticism.
My chosen faith vehicle (or the one that chose me by means of upbringing) of Christianity seems to cultivate a lot of neuroticism, and then implicitly conditions us to use the ego defense mechanism called undoing (epitomized by compulsive hand washing).
But this compensatory defense does not leave us whole or fully integrated or “coherent.” We try too hard to absolve our sins, and our hands still feel dirty no matter how many times we wash them or how hard we scrub them. Even God-soap is not strong enough, because we subconsciously create a negative self-fulfilling prophecy of being a “sinner.” Undoing our sin is akin to Hue Ning’s (sp? founder of Zen Buddhism) “trying to wipe a mirror clean with a brick.”
Much growth and healing (for the neurotically inclined or shaped) comes from learning to be wisely psychotic-like, letting ‘er rip, shooting intuitively from our hips, having a ridiculous degree of joy, embracing Mystery. Of course a vulnerability towards psychotic-like and sociopathic religious hucksters can happen if the humblized religious followers seek liberation too quickly and easily from the fetters of their neurotic fears. Catharsis without growth.
Divers only may mistake intermediate depth levels with the truly convergent depths that potentially enlighten us to the fact that we are not merely discrete (“classical”) objects, and/or contaminate the dive with ego attachments from the lower frequency surface zones of overall reality. An other might help compliment and transcend such attachments, and help one see past one’s blind spots.
In general, introversion would seem to predispose a person toward diving, but not necessarily DEEP diving. Many introverts never get beyond snorkeling!
And extroversion would seem to incline a person towards gathering. But there is no guarantee that the natural stardust divinity will be gathered. Perhaps only superficial glitter an fools gold is gathered.
Yes, all personality and/or spiritual functions must work together if we are to become more fully integrated, “coherent,” whole.
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
Should read: “and false humility causes positive projection.”
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
I might be one of those Logos theologians?! Except they might be overly influenced by Plato’s Ideal forms? And not enough by Aristotles’ potentiality? Too pure for a SupRAnatural flow of God into flesh?
I don’t know, since I have not studied this school of theology. Is it gnostic-like?
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
Eric, But ideally we could learn to go deeper without depending on suffering to get there. We could learn the skill of diving without sinking from the heaviness of suffering.
That’s where I think Buddhism’s emphasis on loosening our grip and mindfulness comes into play, even though I’m a Christian. But I strive to be spiritual first, Christian only if the vehicle works and doesn’t get in the way too much.
John was probably more influenced by Philo of Alexandria and Jewish mystical speculation than by Plato or Aristotle.
Generally the Hellenic term is impersonal, whereas for John its personal, more akin to the masculine form of sophia, or the Hebrew chokmah.
Ah ... big question.
When you say 'gnostic-like', d'you mean the philosophy of various circa 2nd century groups? If so, then I'd say generally, no, although there may be some wriggle-room with a given 'gnostic' system – as there were more than one, hard to say.
If you mean gnosis as such, then I'd say yes – and the person to look to is Maximus the Confessor (579-662AD) – he who inverted the age-old Platonic model and came up with an interpretation which rests on Biblical reference and solves a number of issues with the old models.
Death in the family, losing your, job, accidents, breakdown in relationships, can all lead to suffering. Suffering is a reaction to events in our life, but is suffering the only option? Can we somehow learn from tragedy, to become more resilient, patient and persevere, can we dig deeper and search for the human spirit of kindness to keep going.
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
I wrote this on another thread (Here We Go, posted by Thomas):
“The assumption is that God or Deepest Self wants us to grow, perhaps to wake up (as one of the German Idealists, Schilling? claimed) from the mere-ness or “slumbering” of surface, physical, reality—to become more lucid within the “dream” that we mistake as overall reality.”
When real life “nightmares” occur, the temptation, or even the default program REACTION, is to exit the disturbing, painful, drama.
During a nighttime dream we wake up in a sweat, heart pounding. “Whew, glad it was only a dream!” The real life equivalent is to become distracted by alternate experiences, creating a kind of distance from the real life “nightmare.” Nothing wrong with creating distance, if temporary and measured/managed. It is a means of pacing ourselves in the marathon called life, But the temptation is to hold onto the distancing, or numbing, or any other ego defense that reduces the pain and/or fear and/or maddening sense of spinning out of control . We can become dependent on managing the pain instead of, as you insightfully/wisely say, allow it to teach us how to operate, or even ORIGINATE, from a deeper, stronger, more stable, more resource-full, zone of the “fountain” (the one that flows deep and wide) that is each of us, a person.
Now, imagine that our reality is Mind Itself’s dream. Is it possible to stay in the disturbing dream and allow an awareness that Mind is behind the drama, so calm down and experience the “show,” allow it to SHOW us something that helps us GROW? If we answer “yes,” we have a shot at living, participating, LUCIDLY within God’s dream.
The key is to develop a sense of a Mind behind and within the life drama/dream. When the nightmare comes, we will have an alternate tool/means than mere escape. But this “sense” probably has to be carried more or less subconsciously via a process of prior conditioning. It must be a kind of muscle memory, so it can pop up spontaneously in the moment of a nightmare-ish experience.
“The assumption is that God or Deepest Self wants us to grow, perhaps to wake up (as one of the German Idealists, Schilling? claimed) from the mere-ness or “slumbering” of surface, physical, reality—to become more lucid within the “dream” that we mistake as overall reality.”
When real life “nightmares” occur, the temptation, or even the default program REACTION, is to exit the disturbing, painful, drama.
During a nighttime dream we wake up in a sweat, heart pounding. “Whew, glad it was only a dream!” The real life equivalent is to become distracted by alternate experiences, creating a kind of distance from the real life “nightmare.” Nothing wrong with creating distance, if temporary and measured/managed. It is a means of pacing ourselves in the marathon called life, But the temptation is to hold onto the distancing, or numbing, or any other ego defense that reduces the pain and/or fear and/or maddening sense of spinning out of control . We can become dependent on managing the pain instead of, as you insightfully/wisely say, allow it to teach us how to operate, or even ORIGINATE, from a deeper, stronger, more stable, more resource-full, zone of the “fountain” (the one that flows deep and wide) that is each of us, a person.
Now, imagine that our reality is Mind Itself’s dream. Is it possible to stay in the disturbing dream and allow an awareness that Mind is behind the drama, so calm down and experience the “show,” allow it to SHOW us something that helps us GROW? If we answer “yes,” we have a shot at living, participating, LUCIDLY within God’s dream.
The key is to develop a sense of a Mind behind and within the life drama/dream. When the nightmare comes, we will have an alternate tool/means than mere escape. But this “sense” probably has to be carried more or less subconsciously via a process of prior conditioning. It must be a kind of muscle memory, so it can pop up spontaneously in the moment of a nightmare-ish experience.
'Amir Alzzalam
Šayṭānist
- Messages
- 1,156
- Reaction score
- 350
- Points
- 83
"What does not kill us, makes us stronger" - Friedrich Nietzsche
"Living a meaningful life requires that we choose to take on a reasonable amount of pain" - Paul Bloom (psychologist)
Suffering is a part of life and a normal emotion. Suffering makes us more resilient to endure hardships in life.
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
Re this that you replied: “Again, I can see what you're saying, but another way is to detatch from self and all things that keep us where we are – one could argue that in seeking to 'own it' we want it on our (egoic) terms – but that's not what I think you're saying. “
You are correct that I mean beyond an ego-bound “Self.” Again, trusting that ego melts away in the deepest levels of consciousness and operation/being. What use would ego have in such a highly convergent zone. Nothing to defend once everything is available. In a way, clinging to ego is embracing the “law of deficit.” A stubborn individual ego makes a negative self fulfilling deficit by cutting itself off from the universe’s resources via its insistence on being a separate “individual”. I’m assuming that the “self” would realize it is no longer the merely individual “self” it once thought it was. Going deep (deep enough, that is) takes it wide.
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
When my youngest son lay in a hospital bed in a coma, I had one of only two visions I’ve had my entire life (now 68 years of age). I “saw” his brain neurons as light strands weaving back together. This could have simply been a semiconscious visual prayer for his healing, in which I used my made-up imagery to attempt to transfer healing energy to him. But then the vision session got more interesting and had me, my wife, son, and Jesus walking on a beach toward the ocean. Then I felt the peaceful ocean breeze blowing on our collective foreheads (no distinction of having individual foreheads). I called forth the archetype of the “oceanic” God, or else the oceanic God pulled my consciousness and sense of being there (in a “deep” zone).
As a grieving father who loves his son, I had nothing else I could do but go deep. Was it all imaginary, or did I actually interface with a metaphysical reality? I choose to believe a bit of both, in which I translated via personally meaningful images, but also dipped into an actually deep zone that facilitated the channel ing of healing energy.
The one other time I had a vision was after a meditation session. I saw a seed somehow going across the four seasons. I was driving a car at the time (having just left the roadside park where I had been meditating), and was frightened when I realized the vision had eclipsed my seeing of the (literal/actual) road before me!
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
Forgot to mention that I sensed Jesus escorting/leading us to the Ocean. Again, I’m assuming the helpful agent could have been a character from other faith traditions had I been raised in those, or had chosen to identify with them. Jesus happened to be personally meaningful to ME.
Last edited:
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
Neat!
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
Loved that. If overall reality is as I believe it to be, then at its deepest, inmost, level Self and Other (as entities or as sources of power) probably is irrelevant.
I didn’t get much exposure to object relations theory in my psychology education, but SOME. Especially from reading (although on my own, rather than in school) RD Lang’s book, The Divided Self. As I recall, a main feature of healthy relationships and personality development is learning to accept the paradox of self and other as being both 2 and 1. Both separate AND united (as one). Basic trust early on goes a long way towards embracing this paradox. According to Lang, those who can’t suffer not only in the external, INTERpersonal, relationship sphere, but also in the internal, INTRApersonal sphere as well, sometimes developing into a self so divided that a schism of psychotic proportions occurs.
But these are psychological concepts independent of metaphysical concepts. The necessary acceptance of the paradox could simply be used like theorems in geometry,
The advantage of a compatible metaphysical model is that the theorem makes sense. If deepest realty is highly convergent, then the paradox of oneness and otherness is no longer paradoxical. It only stands to reason that those experiencing life in a physical surface domain would translate the convergence as being a “paradox.” But it’s just the limits of our lens. Deepest “reality” may even transcend Emanuel Kant’s two main “apriori” mental biases of in and out (spatial) and past, present, and future (temporal). Can a deep part of our consciousness “stand under” a way of conceptualizing overall realty WITHOUT using either of those apriori assumptions?
I say yes. But perhaps not masterfully or consistently. But “yes” enough to help make a more harmonious world and whole-feeling self.
Sorry I fell off the grid for awhile. Became busy and emotionally involved in a music project that ate up most of my free time and attention. It doesn’t mean I don’t value these in-depth discussions. I DO.
I guess (to modify one of John Lennon’s lyrics: Life is what happens when you’re busy blogging!
Love,
Darrell (otherbrother)
otherbrother
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 43
Lyrics to the song I was preparing for a gifted singer to perform in our church. I did the guitar fingerpicking, and chimed in during the chorus. :
Tend the Fire
Too long is the road
to find yourself
if you lose yourself
in the frantic steps you take,
even though you ache
for something real to feel
that you would hold onto.
It may not occur to you
what’s really worth holding onto,
but there’s a path that’s hidden
deep inside.
They say the temple doors are guarded
using flames. And most are thwarted,
but the hungry-hearted
sometimes feel so cold
they stumble toward its warmth.
It may not occur to you
How a thing that burns
might turn into something that’s
so wonderful to hold.
Don’t go outside to outrun your fear.
Just tend the fire of the heart hearth here.
(Repeat)
Don’t tighten up
and push the River.
Rest on the banks
of a gracious Giver.
If you push, you’ll just head down
the stream to a murky dream
that bears no fruit you want.
Only whirlpools
that will confuse you,
will abuse you.
So just stay put,
and sink into the
soft and fertile soil.
The temple has an inner sanctum.
If you enter, thank them.
They will show the way
to the home that you’ve been missing,
merely wishing,
wishing you were there.
It may not occur to you
how love’s been waiting to embrace you
with the arms and fingers
of its fire.
Don’t go outside to outrun your fear.
Just tend the fire of the heart hearth here.
(Repeat)