If you are referring to some physical phenomena, no doubt.That which is claimed without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
..but you ignore philosophical thought at your peril.
There IS evidence of G-d .. through His messengers.
If you are referring to some physical phenomena, no doubt.That which is claimed without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
Look at the Rosary -- basically ansl beads. The first two seconds -- that's your stance?
He doesn't care. He's just a trollIf you are referring to some physical phenomena, no doubt.
..but you ignore philosophical thought at your peril.
There IS evidence of G-d .. through His messengers.
I don't ignore philosophical thought....it is philosophical thought that demands you provide evidence.If you are referring to some physical phenomena, no doubt.
..but you ignore philosophical thought at your peril.
There IS evidence of G-d .. through His messengers.
No it doesn't. That's the whole discussion --philosophy isn't empirical. This isn't a physics blog. You're so confused and also so retarded, lolit is philosophical thought that demands you provide evidence.
Look up the philosophy of an existence claim. In an existence claim the burden of proof for the claimed existence is on the claimant.No it doesn't. That's the whole discussion --philosophy isn't empirical. This isn't a physics blog. You're so confused and also so retarded, lol
You don't want evidence .. you are just amusing yourself....it is philosophical thought that demands you provide evidence..
If you are the one making the claim, you need evidence. You want the evidence, not me.You don't want evidence .. you are just amusing yourself..
You can lead a theist to knowledge, but you can't make one think.If this is what you want to do in your retirement you must have a boring life. Coming to an interfaith forum to troll? You aren't very good at it.
Come on.. that one was lame.You can lead a theist to knowledge, but you can't make one think.
Great, you can read. Try Aesop's Fables for Children.But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven.
I'm predicting you won't be here long.Great, you can read. Try Aesop's Fables for Children.
Is that a more reliable prediction than this one?I'm predicting you won't be here long.
32 “Now learn this parable from the fig tree: When its branch has already become tender and puts forth leaves, you know that summer is near. 33 So you also, when you see all these things, know that [e]it is near—at the doors! 34 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place. 35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass away.Is that a more reliable prediction than this one?
"Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away." Math 24:34-35
Just wondering...
Exactly....you can't teach someone something who is determined not to learn it.32 “Now learn this parable from the fig tree: When its branch has already become tender and puts forth leaves, you know that summer is near. 33 So you also, when you see all these things, know that [e]it is near—at the doors! 34 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place. 35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass away.
Try reading the whole chapter.. it's rather enlightening. Just a warning though, trying to use scripture to disprove God to me will never work.
As a parting thought:That which is claimed without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
Yes, it does. The word "rational" has the word "ratio" embedded in it. To be rational is to ratio the degree of belief with the strength of the evidence.As a parting thought:
1: That something is claimed without evidence does not thereby mean the thing claimed is true, nor that it's untrue.
2: That something is dismissed without evidence does not mean the thing dismissed is untrue, nor that it is true.
Your statement actually doesn't say anything reasonable or rational with regard to its object.