Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
Not for all. Some still stick to their books which are comical, claiming existence of Gods and messengers from that imagined entity.Learning is rapidly improving as well.
Not for all. Some still stick to their books which are comical, claiming existence of Gods and messengers from that imagined entity.Learning is rapidly improving as well.
Well, according to your worldview, consciousness is an epiphenomenon, an elaborate illusion that's an unintentional by-product of random matter-in-motion, so, when I stick to "their books," I cannot really deviate from the predetermined pathway set by the initial conditions of the universe and the subsequent chain of cause-and-effect.Not for all. Some still stick to their books which are ridiculous, claiming existence of Gods and messengers from that imagined entity.
Nothing is predetermined in nature. Happens when it happens, and it has no consequences for the way of things.I cannot really deviate from the predetermined pathway set by the initial conditions of the universe and the subsequent chain of cause-and-effect.
Well, please clarify what you previously wrote in another thread:Nothing is predetermined in nature.
Unless you have changed your mind since then, you are saying that our actions are predetermined or lack free will. In other words, I cannot change my "ridiculous" choice because it is all chemical and electrical reaction in the midst of a long chain of cause-and-effect.And if you talk of human consciousness, that too basically is this, chemical and electrical reaction.
Materialism is Deadwhat you previously wrote in another thread:
Not all forms. Just what it is to be human.You implied technological advancements are somehow separate from other forms of human improvement.
Not my intention. Rather highlighting the assumption that because there has been technological progress, every aspect of what it is to be human has progressed.Here you bracket off "technological achievements" as if isolating it from everything else
The material condition. Because man's material condition improves, that does not necessarily mean he has progressed or evolved in any significant manner.... but technology can be a powerful tool for improving the human condition.
It's just tech. It shows the best and worst of us, as tech has always done, since the lever and wheel.What about the vast amounts of positive interactions and diverse perspectives also present on social media?
Our actions depend on chance, probability and randomness. Neither predetermined nor because of any free will. The are basically sort of consequental.Unless you have changed your mind since then, you are saying that our actions are predetermined or lack free will. In other words, I cannot change my "ridiculous" choice because it is all chemical and electrical reaction in the midst of a long chain of cause-and-effect.
Does consciousness have a role in influencing actions? Stating consciousness is purely "chemical and electrical reaction" could mean conscious agents have no independent causal power. In other words, consciousness could be a byproduct of physical processes but doesn't itself influence them - that is, a mere shadow of the flame. Are you saying this is indeed the case? Or do you believe that consciousness can influence those chemical and electrical reactions to some degree?Our actions depend on chance, probability and randomness. Neither predetermined nor because of any free will. The are basically sort of consequental.
Sure. Have you seen a person who is unconscious doing anything?Does consciousness have a role in influencing actions? Stating consciousness is purely "chemical and electrical reaction" could mean conscious agents have no independent causal power. In other words, consciousness could be a byproduct of physical processes but doesn't itself influence them - that is, a mere shadow of the flame. Are you saying this is indeed the case? Or do you believe that consciousness can influence those chemical and electrical reactions to some degree?
If causal agency is denied, then it suggests that our actions don't truly make a difference and are simply predetermined outcomes of random processes. It also suggests our actions are not in any meaningful way consequential.
You stated actions depend on chance, probability, and randomness. In my view human actions still involve agency, choice, and intentionality. Anyway, your statement that "actions depend on chance, probability, and randomness" doesn't necessarily negate determinism. Randomness can be a deterministic process with unpredictable outcomes.
Saying our actions are consequential does not clear things up.
That looks like a contradiction, to me..Chemical and electric reactions make people conscious. They store memory as well. And a person's acts are based on memory of his/her experiences.
Consciousness cannot influence the chemical and electric reactions, it follows them..
I do not see what is the problem in this statement.That looks like a contradiction, to me..
Which is it? You seem to be demeaning consciousness/memory, by saying they are only
chemical/electrical .. but they are more than that, imo.
If they were not, we would not THINK that they were .. we would SEE the "deception".
No .. I think they are "more than that" in the same way as I think that "science" is notTry to prove for us that they are more than that.
You think that way because your religious book, messenger of Allah and the clerics have dinned that into your mind..
No, I have not.Sure. Have you seen a person who is unconscious doing anything?
You said: "Consciousness cannot influence the chemical and electric reactions, it follows them."Chemical and electric reactions make people conscious. They store memory as well. And a person's acts are based on memory of his/her experiences.
Consciousness cannot influence the chemical and electric reactions, it follows them.
Or so you think.If our actions are random, then they are not pre-determined.
No. They cannot change the structure or physical make up of brain or physiological changes in the body (like what? Growing horns?). This is woo.Meditation and mindfulness practices can lead to structural changes in the brain. Through focused attention and awareness, consciousness can change the physical makeup of the brain. Also, the placebo effect shows belief and expectation can start physiological changes in the body.
Like what is mentioned in Torah, Bible or Qur'an?History is REAL, for example.
This would mean our ability to self-reflect and intentionally act are but meaningless illusions. Talk about woo.Human actions too are complex deterministic - there is no free-will. It just appears to be so.
All you did here was present a false dichotomy by saying these changes in the body are dramatic ones or nothing at all. No, not in terms of dramatic changes like growing horns or shaping my brain into a donut (although I do love chocolate donuts every now and then), but in terms of enhancing neuroplasticity.They cannot change the structure or physical make up of brain or physiological changes in the body (like what? Growing horns?). This is woo.
We can act in whatever way we want, but it does not change the way things are.This would mean our ability to self-reflect and intentionally act are but meaningless illusions. Talk about woo.
The position supported by research shows subtle but significant changes. Studies have shown that mindfulness training can increase grey matter density in brain regions associated with learning, memory, and more. But this should be impossible under your framework, shouldn't it?
A similar top-down causation by an intelligent entity is plausible, so I can see why you would want to avoid any form of top-down causation.