The Inferior and Superior `Edenic State

LNM

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
The Inferior and Superior `Edenic State

The familiar account of `Eden, in the Torah, is not the source of the fundamental account of our past; nor is it a spontaneous, account that sprang into place as Moses spoke. Rather, it is the account handed down by word of mouth from generation to generation of human existence; since its origin with Adam. This first took place throughout the somewhat incoherent, unrecorded ages of human history. Thus, this Message emerged piercing the darkness of our species’ origins like an inextinguishable ray of Light that ties together the time when human life began, with the time when the human mind could express itself; setting pen to parchment.

`Eden is the most ancient story in human existence, and yet it is the most recent. It has survived precisely because it embodies the basic fact of human life. A fact that has not changed one iota; amid all of the superficial changes that human civilization has undergone. This fact alone remains a constant amidst this vivid array of subjective experiences; that being the dualistic conflict between Good and evil, the Eternal Struggle of higher evolutionary development against iniquity, and yes even the very Struggle against such notions of duality itself.

In these latter days you will find the minds of the masses fed by the hopes, dreams, fears and aspirations of the new and strange Earthly existence that is bursting forth at the seams of the new dawn; apparent off in the horizon of the coming Age of ages. Not since the days of Adam have such notions been extant in such a riotous, unrestrained manner of zestful expression.

For many years, anthropologists have presented an idyllic view of life in simpler societies, making them seem almost like the last remnants of `Eden. As numerous scholars of human sociology have noted, it is one of the greatest ironies of evolution that progress in technology and social organization has often been linked with ethical regression. Horticultural societies provide several of the earliest examples. Some of the most shocking are the emergence and spread of human and animal sacrifice, as well as cannibalism. For a species herbivorous in origin, this is quite counter-intuitive, and unexplained by mainstream views of history.

These startling developments and social patterns are a cold reminder that technological advances do not necessarily imply or entail moral progress. In fact, as stated, much the opposite is true. It is for this reason that even the Angels, (the Malakhim, or Mala'ikah) were commanded to prostrate before primitive Adam, and all did save the one who came to be referred to as "Satan" or "Iblis." It is for this reason that even the technologically advanced jinn were, and are spiritual and morally retarded in the Eyes of the Divine, despite their imagined "progress." However, if we study the history and lives of our “`Edenic” predecessors, the last thing we find is an enlightened people, too “morally advanced” to partake in purported “technological progress.” Rather, what we do find is a species with simple ways, from a much simpler time. Time and research has proven many of their ways to have prevailed in their simplicity, over more modern manners of accomplishing the same ends. However, still other aspects of their societal ways of life have proven to be nothing more than a demonstration of righteousness enacted of ignorance. For our hominid ancestors did not consciously “choose” to live according to certain principles and tendencies of the world they were a part of. They simply knew of no other way to live. Unsuccessful attempts at ways of life produced nothing but destruction for those who partook in them. There is only one reason why primordial man lived as they did, in such a perfectly functioning manner: out of shear ignorance. For `Eden is a tale of a lost human state of bliss and freedom from sin. Truly, it was just that. For ignorance tends to leave one in a state of unconscious submission to any force greater than the individual.

“Is it then other than Allah's religion that they seek (to follow), and to Hu submits whoever is in the Heavens and the Earth, willingly or unwillingly, and to Hu shall they be returned.” Qur’an, Sura 3:77

أَفَغَيْرَ دِينِ اللّهِ يَبْغُونَ وَلَهُ أَسْلَمَ مَن فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالأَرْضِ طَوْعًا وَكَرْهًا وَإِلَيْهِ يُرْجَعُونَ

There is however, a state of being beyond the Inferior `Eden of unwilling submission through ignorance; one that does not necessitate ignorance to ensure the functioning of society, and the individual alike. This is the state of genuine enlightenment, the Superior `Eden of Conscious Submission. For in the beginning, we were lived in submission to the commandments because we knew no other way. Thus, it is written: "Elohim said, ‘Let Us make Adam in Our Image, after Our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the sky, and over the cattle, and over all the Earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the Earth.’ Elohim created Adam in Hu’s own Image. In Elohim's image they were created; male and female they were both created. Elohim blessed them. Elohim said to them, ‘Be fruitful, multiply, fill the Earth, and subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the sky, and over every living thing that moves on the Earth.’ Elohim said, ‘Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed, which is on the surface of all the Earth, and every tree, which bears fruit yielding seed. It will be your food.’" Torah, Sefer Ha'Beraseet (Genesis) 1:26-30

וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, נַעֲשֶׂה אָדָם בְּצַלְמֵנוּ כִּדְמוּתֵנוּ; וְיִרְדּוּ בִדְגַת הַיָּם וּבְעוֹף הַשָּׁמַיִם, וּבַבְּהֵמָה וּבְכָל-הָאָרֶץ, וּבְכָל-הָרֶמֶשׂ, הָרֹמֵשׂ עַל-הָאָרֶץ. וַיִּבְרָא אֱלֹהִים אֶת-הָאָדָם בְּצַלְמוֹ, בְּצֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים בָּרָא אֹתוֹ: זָכָר וּנְקֵבָה, בָּרָא אֹתָם. וַיְבָרֶךְ אֹתָם, אֱלֹהִים, וַיֹּאמֶר לָהֶם אֱלֹהִים פְּרוּ וּרְבוּ וּמִלְאוּ אֶת-הָאָרֶץ, וְכִבְשֻׁהָ; וּרְדוּ בִּדְגַת הַיָּם, וּבְעוֹף הַשָּׁמַיִם, וּבְכָל-חַיָּה, הָרֹמֶשֶׂת עַל-הָאָרֶץ. וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, הִנֵּה נָתַתִּי לָכֶם אֶת-כָּל-עֵשֶׂב זֹרֵעַ זֶרַע אֲשֶׁר עַל-פְּנֵי כָל-הָאָרֶץ, וְאֶת-כָּל-הָעֵץ אֲשֶׁר-בּוֹ פְרִי-עֵץ, זֹרֵעַ זָרַע: לָכֶם יִהְיֶה, לְאָכְלָה. וּלְכָל-חַיַּת הָאָרֶץ וּלְכָל-עוֹף הַשָּׁמַיִם וּלְכֹל רוֹמֵשׂ עַל-הָאָרֶץ, אֲשֶׁר-בּוֹ נֶפֶשׁ חַיָּה, אֶת-כָּל-יֶרֶק עֵשֶׂב, לְאָכְלָה; וַיְהִי-כֵן.

In such texts as the Zohar, it is expounded that "Eden" is both our point of origin and also our evolutionary destination. This meaning that there is a "Superior Eden," and an "Inferior Eden." Accordingly, the Superior Eden is the endpoint, the destination, the final stage in all evolution, to which all life in the manifest world is evolving towards. This is what is termed the "Messianic Age."

We were commanded, and we obeyed. There was no thought of disobedience, nor was there consequence of disharmony. This became the basis of our Adversary's challenge against us; that we were untried, that we had no option to disobey, and thus, our evolutionary superiority was a farce. Once the spell of blissful ignorance was broken, it was a dream which we could never return to. For, if the `Eden myth holds true, then there is no way we can ever simply slip back into the lost paradise of our primordial origins. We are now like the Elohim, able to know good from evil. We have eaten from the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, the Etz Chayyim, the "Tree of Life," has now been hidden from view. It is for this reason the Book has been sent in its many manifestations (to every people and culture), to serve as the instruction in our exodus from the state of "forgetting," and as a guide into a 50,000 year long Era of Messianic Consciousness in our imminent reality, and into the Garden of Paradise in the World to Come. Of this Messianic Era it is written:

"All the Malaikah and Ar-Ruh Ascend unto Hu in a Day the length of which is Fifty-Thousand years." Al-Qur'an, Sura 70:4

تَعْرُجُ الْمَلَائِكَةُ وَالرُّوحُ إِلَيْهِ فِي يَوْمٍ كَانَ مِقْدَارُهُ خَمْسِينَ أَلْفَ سَنَةٍ

Some have erroneously perceived this physical world of `Asiyah, of Dunyaa' to be nothing more than a system of cruelty and severity; a world that neither forgives nor cares. Failure is death and weakness is a capital crime. For them, this primal truth is embraced and set up as an idyllic state of living. For this individual, supposed “empowerment of the self” is all that is necessary and all that matters. For that is the carnal way.

Others see these primal tendencies and cringe; unable to face the harsh reality of the unsheltered world. They know not why they feel such a way, nor do they comprehend why so much of the world operates upon such animalistic principles. They envision a world where the child plays by the serpent’s nest, where the lion lays down with the lamb. They are vexed concerning the cold, callous nature of their surroundings. They strive for a world that can never be, for all. Theirs is the world foreseen by the prophet Yeshayah, Isaiah when he wrote: "The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them. The cow will feed with the bear, their young will lie down together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox. The infant will play near the hole of the cobra, and the young child put his hand into the viper’s nest. They will neither harm nor destroy in all my Holy Mountain, for the Earth will be full of the knowledge of YHWH as the waters cover the sea." Yeshayahu (Isaiah) 11:6-9

וְגָר זְאֵב עִם-כֶּבֶשׂ, וְנָמֵר עִם-גְּדִי יִרְבָּץ; וְעֵגֶל וּכְפִיר וּמְרִיא יַחְדָּו, וְנַעַר קָטֹן נֹהֵג בָּם. וּפָרָה וָדֹב תִּרְעֶינָה, יַחְדָּו יִרְבְּצוּ יַלְדֵיהֶן; וְאַרְיֵה, כַּבָּקָר יֹאכַל-תֶּבֶן. וְשִׁעֲשַׁע יוֹנֵק, עַל-חֻר פָּתֶן; וְעַל מְאוּרַת צִפְעוֹנִי, גָּמוּל יָדוֹ הָדָה. לֹא-יָרֵעוּ וְלֹא-יַשְׁחִיתוּ, בְּכָל-הַר קָדְשִׁי: כִּי-מָלְאָה הָאָרֶץ, דֵּעָה אֶת-יְהוָה, כַּמַּיִם, לַיָּם מְכַסִּים.

Yet, still they often fail to question why they, and others like themselves, feel the way they do. Why do they have compassion, while others have at best apathy, and at worst calculating brutality? It is more than for their own benefit, they seek to bring betterment to the whole of the system. The hunter calls them weak, the soldier claims they lack discipline. Yet, in their own hearts, they perceive a higher Truth, a magnified perception of a conscious Order, from which we emerged and to which we are returning. They have begun to tear down the veil concealing the blueprints of the new paradigm. They are its vanguard. They have taken the first step to the next stage of mankind’s evolution. They have come to spread the New Ethic...
 
Kindest Regards, LNM, and welcome to CR!

Thank you most sincerely for your well written post!
LNM said:
This first took place throughout the somewhat incoherent, unrecorded ages of human history. Thus, this Message emerged piercing the darkness of our species’ origins like an inextinguishable ray of Light that ties together the time when human life began, with the time when the human mind could express itself; setting pen to parchment.
I love the poetic image of the message piercing the darkness, but humanity was already expressing itself long before Eden with the cave paintings. I might also add that if parchment were used, the writings would be lost to us. Back then, it was a stylus and clay, or cuneiform.

`Eden is the most ancient story in human existence,
I see. Are you absolutely certain?

This fact alone remains a constant amidst this vivid array of subjective experiences; that being the dualistic conflict between Good and evil, the Eternal Struggle of higher evolutionary development against iniquity, and yes even the very Struggle against such notions of duality itself.
I agree that duality plays an important role in many religions in some form or other, but not all religions recognize duality as conflict.

For many years, anthropologists have presented an idyllic view of life in simpler societies, making them seem almost like the last remnants of `Eden.
Just curious, who are these anthropologists? The anthropologists I am familiar with paint no such picture. How can living in a cave in the middle of the deep freeze we call an ice age, hunting animals large enough to stomp your brains be compared with Eden? Even if we were to fast forward just a little to the advent of agriculture, times were far from idyllic.

Now, I will grant that some philosophers, spiritualists, religious reconstructionists, anarchists and poets seem to imply that "simpler societies" are somehow idyllic in an Edenic sort of way, but these people are not anthropologists. Even among "simpler societies" living in the modern world, this just is not true, and we have anthropology to thank for allowing us to see this.

As numerous scholars of human sociology have noted, it is one of the greatest ironies of evolution that progress in technology and social organization has often been linked with ethical regression. Horticultural societies provide several of the earliest examples.
Would you be kind enough to name these scholars and sources? Agriculture quite rather provided "leisure" time, which civilized humanity then spent developing many things, like the wheel, houses, cloth, metal, calendars and codified ethics/morality. Of course, this was also the time of the development of warfare as an art, and fortifications as defense, but that is no indicator of ethical regression.

In short, technology and social organization is not shown to be linked specifically with ethical regression.

Some of the most shocking are the emergence and spread of human and animal sacrifice, as well as cannibalism. For a species herbivorous in origin, this is quite counter-intuitive, and unexplained by mainstream views of history.
Oh my! When is it you believe these things to have emerged? And are you speaking factually or philosophically? Perhaps a good resource to point you to is "The Golden Bough" by Professor Frazer.

These startling developments and social patterns are a cold reminder that technological advances do not necessarily imply or entail moral progress.
Now, in proper context, I can agree with this. Technological advances are not good indicators of moral progress as such.

In fact, as stated, much the opposite is true.
However, this is not true. I believe this is called "false dichotomy," that is, if one extreme is not true, then the other extreme must be true. Actually, the answer probably lies somewhere in the middle of the extremes, and subject to a wide lattitude of variability depending on the era and circumstances.

Rather, what we do find is a species with simple ways, from a much simpler time. Time and research has proven many of their ways to have prevailed in their simplicity, over more modern manners of accomplishing the same ends. However, still other aspects of their societal ways of life have proven to be nothing more than a demonstration of righteousness enacted of ignorance. For our hominid ancestors did not consciously “choose” to live according to certain principles and tendencies of the world they were a part of. They simply knew of no other way to live.
See, now you confuse me. It seems to me you are shifting from the physical reality of archeological evidence to religious moral history, attempting to lay the one on top of the other in order to grant validity to the supposition. But "time and research" have not "proven many of their ways to have prevailed in their simplicity, over more modern manners of accomplishing the same ends." I need only point to the art and science of medicine, but many more examples can be brought forth. The only possible place this could conceivably hold some validity in my mind, is the specific morality myth of Eden with direct application among specific Monotheistic religions, which is a very limited view to hold. When looking at the known evidences, there really isn't much (or any that I recall) to support the fact of Eden. There truly is no archeological or anthropological evidence of Eden, certainly none I am aware of. Believe me, I wish there were, it would answer a great many questions I have. But I cannot overlay implication from my faith onto factual reality without creating a distortion that leads to falsehood. Truth is not fact, unless fact is held as truth. There is a great deal of difference between truth and fact, the distinction is not merely semantic. My truth is not necessarily your truth, but facts are facts to us both provided we can see beyond our truths.

“Is it then other than Allah's religion that they seek (to follow), and to Hu submits whoever is in the Heavens and the Earth, willingly or unwillingly, and to Hu shall they be returned.” Qur’an, Sura 3:77
I want to be very clear, I am not calling your faith into question. What I am questioning is your presentation of supposed fact. What you believe is between you and the Almighty, and is not for me to judge. That is your truth. However, presenting personal belief as fact is altogether a different issue. I do like this verse you present here, it coincides with my truth. But my truth is not everyone else's fact, nor should it be.

Since I do not read Arabic (Farsi?), I will have to take you at your word here for the sake of discussion.

I am being pressed for time, and the balance of your post seems to support my understanding that you are confusing fact with truth. Perhaps this is deliberate?

Why do they have compassion, while others have at best apathy, and at worst calculating brutality? It is more than for their own benefit, they seek to bring betterment to the whole of the system. The hunter calls them weak, the soldier claims they lack discipline. Yet, in their own hearts, they perceive a higher Truth, a magnified perception of a conscious Order, from which we emerged and to which we are returning. They have begun to tear down the veil concealing the blueprints of the new paradigm. They are its vanguard. They have taken the first step to the next stage of mankind’s evolution. They have come to spread the New Ethic...
Do you not think that all cultures and societies are equally capable of compassion and brutality? Indeed, that every individual person is capable of both compassion and brutality? It is the painting of a people with such broad strokes of misunderstanding that creates and magnifies the discord between cultures. It seems every time I turn around, some group or other is claiming they are come to spread a "New Ethic." Quite frankly, I think we need to dust off the old ethic, it is just fine. What we do need is to learn to apply the old ethic beyond ourselves and our limited view of our group. We need to be ethical to "them" just as much as we are to "us." In that, there is no bearing on whether or not a person is a farmer or a soldier, a mother or a husband, a corporate CEO or a hermit, a saint or a sinner. We all must learn to live together and deal with each other with respect and tolerance.

And understanding that each individual must be gauged by their own merits, and that each individual is not a perfect creation, in that all of us are capable of goofing up, of "sin." So, we must all be ready to forgive. There will always exist those individuals of every culture who will prefer not to play by the ethical rules, or who seek the loopholes to justify their unskilled actions. So we must also remember not to judge the whole barrel of apples by the one bad apple we find in the middle. And to hold only the bad apple accountable for its actions.

Thank you for your well written article. I hope you will be kind enough to respond.

Shalom.
 
Back
Top