Well if there is the option not to participate, with no coercion nor 'unfortunate effect' as a result of not taking part, then I don't really see a problem?
I suspect there would be "unfortunate effects" as a result of not taking part, especially in some communities
If, however, it reflects certain sociopolitical ideologies prevalent in your neck of the woods, then I can understand your concern.
It would in many regions or communities
f participation is obligatory, then surely as a state office, someone is overstepping the bounds?
I didn't get a chance to inquire more deeply. I'd be curious.
As I understand it, American schoolkids begin their day with the Pledge of Allegiance?
We used to growing up. I assume many still do
Is there an opt-out for that?
Yes, I was in several school districts (moved a few times during elementary school) and there were always JW kids who simply stood with the class but did not take part.
In fact, in my school in 6th grade, the most popular girl in the class was JW and she stood with the class and was silent during the pledge. We all knew why and there were no issues to my knowledge.
My school took it even further: we had "a moment of reverent silence" after the pledge, with the idea people could pray quietly and anonymously, or not. A reaction to a school prayer issue, I recall that but I don't remember what was actively going on nationally around that topic in the early 1980s. It might even have been a purely local thing with fundamentalists wanting to reintroduce prayer in school locally or something, and that was the compromise. Seemed perfectly cromulent. Don't see why a workplace couldn't do that, but also not sure why it would be needed at work?
Not sure why prayer would be needed at state funder schools either, I do understand the pledge as being instructional about citizenship.
It seems like coercive indoctrination to me.
Possibly? People are not being asked to believe anything supernatural with the pledge, nor anything overtly politically controversial, only taught Americanism (American identity) and citizenship, and being loyal to the nation. In my experience, people could and did opt out for religious reasons, and to my knowledge didn't get repercussions, though I had heard of teachers who were biased getting away with pestering JW students in the past (before the 80s) for not reciting the pledge. They couldn't get away with it by the 80s I guess.
I believe nowadays people can opt out for political reasons or any reason. If a student does not cause a disruption I do not know if they are challenged, but I am not sure.
I guess you could ask the same question about prayer, but I think religion, religious practice, and religious identity, are more sensitive issues. Or, perhaps not?
Civil religion and social cohesion -- Is there something uniting all members of society? In a religiously diverse nation, it would need to be something religiously neutral. I think that's how the pledge fits in.
Other thoughts?